head to head · open source

kong vs Flexprice

kong has 44,147 GitHub stars, 5,210 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. Flexprice has 5,510 stars, 494 forks, 227 open issues and last shipped yesterday. kong leads on adoption by 701% (44,147 vs 5,510 stars). kong is written in Lua under Apache-2.0; Flexprice is written in Go under AGPL-3.0. kong has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, Flexprice 9%. Flexprice was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kong ★ 44K Flexprice ★ 5.5K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

kong Flexprice
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 5.5K
License Apache-2.0 AGPL-3.0
Written in Lua Go
Last push 2026-09-07 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 494
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kong if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kong profile →

pick Flexprice if

  • You want the Flexprice feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Flexprice fits your workflow better

full Flexprice profile →

About kong

Kong (also known as Kong Gateway) is an open source, cloud native, platform agnostic API, LLM, and MCP gateway, licensed under Apache 2.0, built for platform, DevOps, and AI engineering teams that need a single high performance layer to route, secure, and observe both conventional API traffic and agentic LLM traffic.

read the full kong overview →

About Flexprice

Flexprice is an open source metering and billing platform that lets AI native and SaaS teams run usage based, credit based, and hybrid pricing with real time metering and reporting, and it is built for developers who would otherwise have to write billing infrastructure from scratch.

read the full Flexprice overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops trivy vs opentofu uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

kong vs trivy kong vs OpenTofu kong vs jenkins kong vs Pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops kong vs wtf kong vs dagger kong vs task kong vs aws-cdk kong vs infracost

Frequently asked questions

Is kong or Flexprice more popular?

kong has 44,147 GitHub stars and Flexprice has 5,510. kong has the larger community by that measure.

Are kong and Flexprice free?

Both are open source. kong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and Flexprice under AGPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kong and Flexprice?

kong is written in Lua and Flexprice in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kong or Flexprice?

Choose kong if you want the larger community (44,147 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Flexprice if its feature set, stack or AGPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.