head to head · open source

kong vs eNMS

kong has 44,148 GitHub stars, 5,210 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. eNMS has 842 stars, 160 forks, 29 open issues and last shipped 4 months ago. kong leads on adoption by 5,143% (44,148 vs 842 stars). kong is written in Lua under Apache-2.0; eNMS is written in Python under GPL-3.0. kong has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, eNMS 19%. kong was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kong ★ 44K eNMS ★ 842 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

kong eNMS
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 842
License Apache-2.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Lua Python
Last push 2026-09-07 2026-05-08
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 160
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kong if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kong profile →

pick eNMS if

  • You want the eNMS feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and eNMS fits your workflow better

full eNMS profile →

About kong

Kong (also known as Kong Gateway) is an open source, cloud native, platform agnostic API, LLM, and MCP gateway, licensed under Apache 2.0, built for platform, DevOps, and AI engineering teams that need a single high performance layer to route, secure, and observe both conventional API traffic and agentic LLM traffic.

read the full kong overview →

About eNMS

eNMS An enterprise grade vendor agnostic network automation platform. Introduction eNMS is a vendor agnostic NMS designed for building workflow based network automation solutions. It encompasses the following aspects of network automation: Configuration Management Service : Backup with Git, change and rollback of configurations. Validation Services : Validate data about the state of a device with Netmiko and NAPALM. Ansible Service : Store and run Ansible playbooks. REST Service : Send REST calls with variable URL and payload. Python Script Service : Any python script can be integrated into the web UI. eNMS will …

read the full eNMS overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops trivy vs opentofu uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

kong vs trivy kong vs OpenTofu kong vs jenkins kong vs Pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops kong vs wtf kong vs dagger kong vs task kong vs aws-cdk kong vs infracost

Frequently asked questions

Is kong or eNMS more popular?

kong has 44,148 GitHub stars and eNMS has 842. kong has the larger community by that measure.

Are kong and eNMS free?

Both are open source. kong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and eNMS under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kong and eNMS?

kong is written in Lua and eNMS in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kong or eNMS?

Choose kong if you want the larger community (44,148 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose eNMS if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.