head to head · open source

kong vs crossplane

kong has 44,147 GitHub stars, 5,210 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. crossplane has 12,083 stars, 1,264 forks, 194 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. kong leads on adoption by 265% (44,147 vs 12,083 stars). kong is written in Lua under Apache-2.0; crossplane is written in Go under Apache-2.0. kong has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, crossplane 10%. crossplane was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (cloud-native, kubernetes), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kong ★ 44K crossplane ★ 12K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

kong crossplane
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 12K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Lua Go
Last push 2026-09-07 2026-09-15
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kong if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kong profile →

pick crossplane if

  • You want the crossplane feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and crossplane fits your workflow better

full crossplane profile →

About kong

Kong (also known as Kong Gateway) is an open source, cloud native, platform agnostic API, LLM, and MCP gateway, licensed under Apache 2.0, built for platform, DevOps, and AI engineering teams that need a single high performance layer to route, secure, and observe both conventional API traffic and agentic LLM traffic.

read the full kong overview →

About crossplane

Crossplane is a Cloud Native Computing Foundation framework for building cloud native control planes without writing code, aimed at platform and infrastructure teams that run Kubernetes and need to orchestrate applications and infrastructure across clouds through declarative APIs.

read the full crossplane overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops trivy vs opentofu uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

kong vs trivy kong vs OpenTofu kong vs jenkins kong vs Pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops kong vs wtf kong vs dagger kong vs task kong vs aws-cdk kong vs infracost

Frequently asked questions

Is kong or crossplane more popular?

kong has 44,147 GitHub stars and crossplane has 12,083. kong has the larger community by that measure.

Are kong and crossplane free?

Both are open source. kong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and crossplane under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kong and crossplane?

kong is written in Lua and crossplane in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kong or crossplane?

Choose kong if you want the larger community (44,147 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose crossplane if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.