head to head · open source

kong vs architect

kong has 44,147 GitHub stars, 5,210 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. architect has 2,624 stars, 107 forks, 61 open issues and last shipped 13 days ago. kong leads on adoption by 1,582% (44,147 vs 2,624 stars). kong is written in Lua under Apache-2.0; architect is written in JavaScript under Apache-2.0. kong has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, architect 4%. kong was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kong ★ 44K architect ★ 2.6K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

kong architect
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 2.6K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Lua JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-07 2026-09-05
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 107
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kong if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kong profile →

pick architect if

  • You want the architect feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and architect fits your workflow better

full architect profile →

About kong

Kong (also known as Kong Gateway) is an open source, cloud native, platform agnostic API, LLM, and MCP gateway, licensed under Apache 2.0, built for platform, DevOps, and AI engineering teams that need a single high performance layer to route, secure, and observe both conventional API traffic and agentic LLM traffic.

read the full kong overview →

About architect

Architect is an open source JavaScript project for building a functional web app on AWS serverless infrastructure. It lives in the AWS serverless ecosystem, with topics including arc, aws, aws apigateway, aws dynamodb, aws lambda, fwa, infrastructure as code, and serverless. The project uses Apache 2.0 and appears in Infrastructure and Operations, Cloud Infrastructure Management.

read the full architect overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops trivy vs opentofu uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

kong vs trivy kong vs OpenTofu kong vs jenkins kong vs Pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops kong vs wtf kong vs dagger kong vs task kong vs aws-cdk kong vs infracost

Frequently asked questions

Is kong or architect more popular?

kong has 44,147 GitHub stars and architect has 2,624. kong has the larger community by that measure.

Are kong and architect free?

Both are open source. kong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and architect under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kong and architect?

kong is written in Lua and architect in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kong or architect?

Choose kong if you want the larger community (44,147 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose architect if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.