head to head · open source

kong vs App-Store-Connect-CLI

kong has 44,348 GitHub stars, 5,238 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. App-Store-Connect-CLI has 8,211 stars, 716 forks, 89 open issues and last shipped yesterday. kong leads on adoption by 440% (44,348 vs 8,211 stars). kong is written in Lua under Apache-2.0; App-Store-Connect-CLI is written in Go under MIT. kong has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, App-Store-Connect-CLI 9%. App-Store-Connect-CLI was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (devops), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kong ★ 44K App-Store-Connect-CLI ★ 8.2K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

kong App-Store-Connect-CLI
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 8.2K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Lua Go
Last push 2026-10-19 2026-11-02
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 716
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kong if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kong profile →

pick App-Store-Connect-CLI if

  • You want the App-Store-Connect-CLI feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and App-Store-Connect-CLI fits your workflow better

full App-Store-Connect-CLI profile →

About kong

[![][kong logo]][kong url] [![Build Status][badge action image]][badge action url] Kong or Kong Gateway is a cloud native, platform agnostic, scalable API 𖧹 LLM 𖧹 MCP Gateway distinguished for its high performance and extensibility via plugins. It also provides advanced AI traffic capabilities with multi LLM support, semantic security, MCP traffic security and analytics, and more. By providing functionality for proxying, routing, load balancing, health checking, authentication (and more), Kong serves as the central layer for orchestrating microservices or conventional API traffic and agentic LLM and MCP as…

read the full kong overview →

About App-Store-Connect-CLI

App Store Connect CLI A fast, lightweight, and scriptable CLI for the App Store Connect API. Automate iOS, macOS, tvOS, and visionOS release workflows from your terminal, IDE, or CI/CD pipeline. Table of Contents asc skills Sponsors Quick Start Troubleshooting Privacy and telemetry Support Wall of Apps Common Workflows Commands and Reference Documentation Contributing License asc skills Agent Skills for automating asc workflows including builds, TestFlight, metadata sync, submissions, and signing: Install them globally so they are available across projects: asc install skills checks out reviewed commit…

read the full App-Store-Connect-CLI overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

Frequently asked questions

Is kong or App-Store-Connect-CLI more popular?

kong has 44,348 GitHub stars and App-Store-Connect-CLI has 8,211. kong has the larger community by that measure.

Are kong and App-Store-Connect-CLI free?

Both are open source. kong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and App-Store-Connect-CLI under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kong and App-Store-Connect-CLI?

kong is written in Lua and App-Store-Connect-CLI in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kong or App-Store-Connect-CLI?

Choose kong if you want the larger community (44,348 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose App-Store-Connect-CLI if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.