head to head · open source
kong vs aiobotocore
kong has 44,348 GitHub stars, 5,238 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped 15 days ago. aiobotocore has 1,430 stars, 212 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. kong leads on adoption by 3,001% (44,348 vs 1,430 stars). kong is written in Lua under Apache-2.0; aiobotocore is written in Python under Apache-2.0. kong has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, aiobotocore 15%. aiobotocore was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| kong | aiobotocore | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 44K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Lua | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-19 | 2026-10-31 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.2K | ⑂ 212 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick kong if
- You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Lua
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick aiobotocore if
- You want the aiobotocore feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and aiobotocore fits your workflow better
About kong
[![][kong logo]][kong url] [![Build Status][badge action image]][badge action url] Kong or Kong Gateway is a cloud native, platform agnostic, scalable API 𖧹 LLM 𖧹 MCP Gateway distinguished for its high performance and extensibility via plugins. It also provides advanced AI traffic capabilities with multi LLM support, semantic security, MCP traffic security and analytics, and more. By providing functionality for proxying, routing, load balancing, health checking, authentication (and more), Kong serves as the central layer for orchestrating microservices or conventional API traffic and agentic LLM and MCP as…
About aiobotocore
aiobotocore =========== .. ci badge image:: :target: :alt: CI status of main branch .. pre commit badge image:: :target: :alt: pre commit.ci status .. coverage badge image:: :target: :alt: Coverage status on main branch .. docs badge image:: :target: :alt: Documentation Status .. pypi badge image:: :target: :alt: Latest version on pypi .. gitter badge image:: :target: :alt: Chat on Gitter .. pypi downloads badge image:: :target: :alt: Downloads Last Month .. conda badge image:: :target: :alt: Conda downloads .. stackoverflow badge image:: :target: :alt: Stack Overflow Async client for amazon services using…
read the full aiobotocore overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.
Frequently asked questions
Is kong or aiobotocore more popular?
kong has 44,348 GitHub stars and aiobotocore has 1,430. kong has the larger community by that measure.
Are kong and aiobotocore free?
Both are open source. kong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and aiobotocore under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between kong and aiobotocore?
kong is written in Lua and aiobotocore in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, kong or aiobotocore?
Choose kong if you want the larger community (44,348 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose aiobotocore if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.