head to head · open source

kong vs aiobotocore

kong has 44,147 GitHub stars, 5,210 forks, 200 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. aiobotocore has 1,425 stars, 209 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. kong leads on adoption by 2,998% (44,147 vs 1,425 stars). kong is written in Lua under Apache-2.0; aiobotocore is written in Python under Apache-2.0. kong has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, aiobotocore 15%. aiobotocore was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

kong ★ 44K aiobotocore ★ 1.4K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

kong aiobotocore
GitHub stars ★ 44K ★ 1.4K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Lua Python
Last push 2026-09-07 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 5.2K ⑂ 209
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick kong if

  • You weight community size — 44K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Lua
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full kong profile →

pick aiobotocore if

  • You want the aiobotocore feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and aiobotocore fits your workflow better

full aiobotocore profile →

About kong

Kong (also known as Kong Gateway) is an open source, cloud native, platform agnostic API, LLM, and MCP gateway, licensed under Apache 2.0, built for platform, DevOps, and AI engineering teams that need a single high performance layer to route, secure, and observe both conventional API traffic and agentic LLM traffic.

read the full kong overview →

About aiobotocore

aiobotocore is a Python library that provides asynchronous access to Amazon services through botocore and aiohttp. It lives in the Python asyncio and AWS SDK ecosystem, and it is used for cloud infrastructure management. The project exists for programs that use an asyncio event loop but still need to call AWS services without blocking that loop with the synchronous botocore client.

read the full aiobotocore overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

kong vs trivy kong vs opentofu kong vs jenkins kong vs pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops trivy vs opentofu uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph

More Cloud Infrastructure Management projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Cloud Infrastructure Management field.

kong vs trivy kong vs OpenTofu kong vs jenkins kong vs Pulumi kong vs floci kong vs argo-cd kong vs sops kong vs wtf kong vs dagger kong vs task kong vs aws-cdk kong vs infracost

Frequently asked questions

Is kong or aiobotocore more popular?

kong has 44,147 GitHub stars and aiobotocore has 1,425. kong has the larger community by that measure.

Are kong and aiobotocore free?

Both are open source. kong is licensed under Apache-2.0 and aiobotocore under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between kong and aiobotocore?

kong is written in Lua and aiobotocore in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, kong or aiobotocore?

Choose kong if you want the larger community (44,147 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose aiobotocore if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.