head to head · open source

JumpServer vs KeyPass

JumpServer has 31,959 GitHub stars, 5,823 forks, 97 open issues and last shipped today. KeyPass has 788 stars, 111 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. JumpServer leads on adoption by 3,956% (31,959 vs 788 stars). JumpServer is written in Python under GPL-3.0; KeyPass is written in Kotlin under MIT. JumpServer has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, KeyPass 14%. JumpServer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

JumpServer ★ 32K KeyPass ★ 788 category Security & Privacy

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

JumpServer KeyPass
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 788
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python Kotlin
Last push 2026-11-14 2026-11-11
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 111
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick JumpServer if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full JumpServer profile →

pick KeyPass if

  • You want the KeyPass feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Kotlin
  • You evaluated both and KeyPass fits your workflow better

full KeyPass profile →

About JumpServer

An open source PAM platform (Bastion Host) [![][license shield]][license link] [![][docs shield]][docs link] [![][deepwiki shield]][deepwiki link] [![][discord shield]][discord link] [![][docker shield]][docker link] [![][github release shield]][github release link] [![][github stars shield]][github stars link] English · 中文(简体) · 中文(繁體) · 日本語 · Português (Brasil) · Español · Русский · 한국어 What is JumpServer? JumpServer is an open source Privileged Access Management (PAM) platform that provides DevOps and IT teams with on demand and secure access to SSH, RDP, Kubernetes, Database and RemoteApp endpoints through a…

read the full JumpServer overview →

About KeyPass

KeyPass The modern password manager does not store your credentials on servers so your passwords are in your hands, no need to worry. Disclaimer: Please take a backup before updating to the new app. Japanese 👈 Suggest new name for KeyPass Looking for new name for keypass, suggest your name or vote on discussion thread. 🤩 Features [x] Complete Offline: No internet permission has been added [x] Open Source: Code is accessible to everyone [x] Encrypted Backup and Restore [x] Dark Mode Support [x] Material Design 3 [x] Screenshot Blocked [x] Authenticate with device credentials (pin, pattern, biometrics) [x] Auto…

read the full KeyPass overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Related comparisons

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

Frequently asked questions

Is JumpServer or KeyPass more popular?

JumpServer has 31,959 GitHub stars and KeyPass has 788. JumpServer has the larger community by that measure.

Are JumpServer and KeyPass free?

Both are open source. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and KeyPass under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between JumpServer and KeyPass?

JumpServer is written in Python and KeyPass in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, JumpServer or KeyPass?

Choose JumpServer if you want the larger community (31,959 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose KeyPass if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.