head to head · open source
JumpServer vs KeyPass
JumpServer has 31,656 GitHub stars, 5,801 forks, 97 open issues and last shipped today. KeyPass has 786 stars, 111 forks, 31 open issues and last shipped 17 days ago. JumpServer leads on adoption by 3,927% (31,656 vs 786 stars). JumpServer is written in Python under GPL-3.0; KeyPass is written in Kotlin under MIT. JumpServer has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, KeyPass 14%. JumpServer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| JumpServer | KeyPass | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 32K | ★ 786 |
| License | GPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Python | Kotlin |
| Last push | 2026-09-29 | 2026-09-12 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.8K | ⑂ 111 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick JumpServer if
- You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
- You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick KeyPass if
- You want the KeyPass feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Kotlin
- You evaluated both and KeyPass fits your workflow better
About JumpServer
JumpServer is an open source Privileged Access Management (PAM) platform built for DevOps and IT teams. It functions as a bastion host, enabling secure, on demand access to SSH, RDP, Kubernetes, databases, and RemoteApp endpoints via a web browser. The project lives in the Python/Django ecosystem and is licensed under GPL 3.0, with active community contributions and integrations.
read the full JumpServer overview →
About KeyPass
KeyPass is an MIT licensed, fully offline Android password manager written in Kotlin that keeps credentials on the device rather than on a vendor's servers, and it is intended for Android users who want to store passwords, one time codes and autofill data without granting an app network access.
read the full KeyPass overview →
More in Security & Privacy
Related comparisons
More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.
Frequently asked questions
Is JumpServer or KeyPass more popular?
JumpServer has 31,656 GitHub stars and KeyPass has 786. JumpServer has the larger community by that measure.
Are JumpServer and KeyPass free?
Both are open source. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and KeyPass under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between JumpServer and KeyPass?
JumpServer is written in Python and KeyPass in Kotlin. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, JumpServer or KeyPass?
Choose JumpServer if you want the larger community (31,656 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose KeyPass if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.