head to head · open source

JumpServer vs Sa-Token

JumpServer has 31,566 GitHub stars, 5,792 forks, 97 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Sa-Token has 19,048 stars, 2,914 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. JumpServer leads on adoption by 66% (31,566 vs 19,048 stars). JumpServer is written in Python under GPL-3.0; Sa-Token is written in Java under Apache-2.0. JumpServer has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, Sa-Token 15%. JumpServer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

JumpServer ★ 32K Sa-Token ★ 19K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

JumpServer Sa-Token
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 19K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python Java
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 2.9K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick JumpServer if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full JumpServer profile →

pick Sa-Token if

  • You want the Sa-Token feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and Sa-Token fits your workflow better

full Sa-Token profile →

About JumpServer

JumpServer is an open source Privileged Access Management (PAM) platform built for DevOps and IT teams. It functions as a bastion host, enabling secure, on demand access to SSH, RDP, Kubernetes, databases, and RemoteApp endpoints via a web browser. The project lives in the Python/Django ecosystem and is licensed under GPL 3.0, with active community contributions and integrations.

read the full JumpServer overview →

About Sa-Token

Sa Token is a free, open source, one stop Java authentication and authorization framework, licensed under Apache 2.0, that gives Java and Spring Boot developers login authentication, permission checks, distributed sessions, single sign on, OAuth2.0, gateway authentication, JWT integration, API key authorization and API parameter signing from a single dependency.

read the full Sa-Token overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

keycloak vs jumpserver jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik better-auth vs authentik puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault vault vs infisical puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

JumpServer vs Keycloak JumpServer vs Better Auth JumpServer vs authelia JumpServer vs Authentik JumpServer vs casbin JumpServer vs hydra JumpServer vs SuperTokens JumpServer vs Zitadel JumpServer vs Logto JumpServer vs Ory JumpServer vs cas JumpServer vs dex

Frequently asked questions

Is JumpServer or Sa-Token more popular?

JumpServer has 31,566 GitHub stars and Sa-Token has 19,048. JumpServer has the larger community by that measure.

Are JumpServer and Sa-Token free?

Both are open source. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Sa-Token under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between JumpServer and Sa-Token?

JumpServer is written in Python and Sa-Token in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, JumpServer or Sa-Token?

Choose JumpServer if you want the larger community (31,566 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Sa-Token if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.