head to head · open source

JumpServer vs oauth2-proxy

JumpServer has 31,568 GitHub stars, 5,794 forks, 97 open issues and last shipped yesterday. oauth2-proxy has 14,978 stars, 2,196 forks, 285 open issues and last shipped yesterday. JumpServer leads on adoption by 111% (31,568 vs 14,978 stars). JumpServer is written in Python under GPL-3.0; oauth2-proxy is written in Go under MIT. JumpServer has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, oauth2-proxy 15%. oauth2-proxy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

JumpServer ★ 32K oauth2-proxy ★ 15K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

JumpServer oauth2-proxy
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 15K
License GPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 2.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick JumpServer if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full JumpServer profile →

pick oauth2-proxy if

  • You want the oauth2-proxy feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and oauth2-proxy fits your workflow better

full oauth2-proxy profile →

About JumpServer

JumpServer is an open source Privileged Access Management (PAM) platform built for DevOps and IT teams. It functions as a bastion host, enabling secure, on demand access to SSH, RDP, Kubernetes, databases, and RemoteApp endpoints via a web browser. The project lives in the Python/Django ecosystem and is licensed under GPL 3.0, with active community contributions and integrations.

read the full JumpServer overview →

About oauth2-proxy

OAuth2 Proxy is an open source, MIT licensed reverse proxy and middleware written in Go that puts OAuth2 and OpenID Connect authentication in front of web applications, aimed at operators and platform teams who need single sign on without adding auth code to every app.

read the full oauth2-proxy overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

keycloak vs jumpserver jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik better-auth vs authentik puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault vault vs infisical puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

JumpServer vs Keycloak JumpServer vs Better Auth JumpServer vs authelia JumpServer vs Authentik JumpServer vs casbin JumpServer vs Sa-Token JumpServer vs hydra JumpServer vs SuperTokens JumpServer vs Zitadel JumpServer vs Logto JumpServer vs Ory JumpServer vs cas

Frequently asked questions

Is JumpServer or oauth2-proxy more popular?

JumpServer has 31,568 GitHub stars and oauth2-proxy has 14,978. JumpServer has the larger community by that measure.

Are JumpServer and oauth2-proxy free?

Both are open source. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and oauth2-proxy under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between JumpServer and oauth2-proxy?

JumpServer is written in Python and oauth2-proxy in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, JumpServer or oauth2-proxy?

Choose JumpServer if you want the larger community (31,568 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose oauth2-proxy if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.