head to head · open source

JumpServer vs casbin

JumpServer has 31,566 GitHub stars, 5,792 forks, 97 open issues and last shipped yesterday. casbin has 20,396 stars, 1,756 forks, 38 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. JumpServer leads on adoption by 55% (31,566 vs 20,396 stars). JumpServer is written in Python under GPL-3.0; casbin is written in Go under Apache-2.0. JumpServer has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, casbin 9%. JumpServer was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

JumpServer ★ 32K casbin ★ 20K category Security & Privacy

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

JumpServer casbin
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 20K
License GPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Python Go
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-11
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 1.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick JumpServer if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full JumpServer profile →

pick casbin if

  • You want the casbin feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and casbin fits your workflow better

full casbin profile →

About JumpServer

JumpServer is an open source Privileged Access Management (PAM) platform built for DevOps and IT teams. It functions as a bastion host, enabling secure, on demand access to SSH, RDP, Kubernetes, databases, and RemoteApp endpoints via a web browser. The project lives in the Python/Django ecosystem and is licensed under GPL 3.0, with active community contributions and integrations.

read the full JumpServer overview →

About casbin

Apache Casbin is an Apache licensed authorization library for Go that helps developers enforce access control models such as ACL, RBAC, and ABAC inside their own applications rather than in a separate service.

read the full casbin overview →

More in Security & Privacy

PayloadsAllTheThings ★ 81K Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K

Related comparisons

keycloak vs jumpserver jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik jumpserver vs teleport supabase vs better-auth keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik better-auth vs authentik puter vs mattermost mattermost vs nextcloud puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente mattermost vs zulip signal vs ente puter vs vault mattermost vs vault keycloak vs vault vault vs infisical puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

JumpServer vs Keycloak JumpServer vs Better Auth JumpServer vs authelia JumpServer vs Authentik JumpServer vs Sa-Token JumpServer vs hydra JumpServer vs SuperTokens JumpServer vs Zitadel JumpServer vs Logto JumpServer vs Ory JumpServer vs cas JumpServer vs dex

Frequently asked questions

Is JumpServer or casbin more popular?

JumpServer has 31,566 GitHub stars and casbin has 20,396. JumpServer has the larger community by that measure.

Are JumpServer and casbin free?

Both are open source. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and casbin under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between JumpServer and casbin?

JumpServer is written in Python and casbin in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, JumpServer or casbin?

Choose JumpServer if you want the larger community (31,566 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose casbin if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.