head to head · open source

JumpServer vs Logto

JumpServer has 31,549 GitHub stars, 5,791 forks, 97 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Logto has 14,580 stars, 1,206 forks, 183 open issues and last shipped yesterday. JumpServer leads on adoption by 116% (31,549 vs 14,580 stars). JumpServer is written in Python under GPL-3.0; Logto is written in TypeScript under MPL-2.0. JumpServer has attracted 18% as many forks as stars, Logto 8%. Logto was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

JumpServer ★ 32K Logto ★ 15K category Security & Privacy

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

JumpServer Logto
GitHub stars ★ 32K ★ 15K
License GPL-3.0 MPL-2.0
Written in Python TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 1.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick JumpServer if

  • You weight community size — 32K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full JumpServer profile →

pick Logto if

  • You want the Logto feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and Logto fits your workflow better

full Logto profile →

About JumpServer

JumpServer is an open source Privileged Access Management (PAM) platform built for DevOps and IT teams. It functions as a bastion host, enabling secure, on demand access to SSH, RDP, Kubernetes, databases, and RemoteApp endpoints via a web browser. The project lives in the Python/Django ecosystem and is licensed under GPL 3.0, with active community contributions and integrations.

read the full JumpServer overview →

About Logto

Logto is an open source authentication and authorization infrastructure for SaaS and AI applications. It is written in TypeScript, licensed under MPL 2.0, and positioned as an open alternative to Auth0. The project sits in the identity and access management ecosystem, where it provides a central service for login, consent, tokens, user directories, and access control.

read the full Logto overview →

More in Security & Privacy

Puter ★ 44K Mattermost ★ 39K Keycloak ★ 37K Tailscale ★ 37K HashiCorp Vault ★ 36K ProjectDiscovery ★ 31K

Related comparisons

keycloak vs jumpserver jumpserver vs better-auth jumpserver vs authentik keycloak vs better-auth keycloak vs authentik better-auth vs authentik keycloak vs supertokens keycloak vs zitadel puter vs mattermost puter vs signal puter vs ente mattermost vs signal mattermost vs ente signal vs ente puter vs element puter vs fluxer puter vs vault mattermost vs vault puter vs unkey mattermost vs unkey puter vs phase puter vs keyshade vault vs unkey mattermost vs phase

More Identity & Access Management (IAM) projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Identity & Access Management (IAM) field.

JumpServer vs Keycloak JumpServer vs Better Auth JumpServer vs Authentik JumpServer vs SuperTokens JumpServer vs Zitadel JumpServer vs Ory JumpServer vs Hexclave JumpServer vs Permify JumpServer vs Authgear

Frequently asked questions

Is JumpServer or Logto more popular?

JumpServer has 31,549 GitHub stars and Logto has 14,580. JumpServer has the larger community by that measure.

Are JumpServer and Logto free?

Both are open source. JumpServer is licensed under GPL-3.0 and Logto under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between JumpServer and Logto?

JumpServer is written in Python and Logto in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, JumpServer or Logto?

Choose JumpServer if you want the larger community (31,549 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Logto if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.