head to head · open source

Inngest vs tork

Inngest has 6,017 GitHub stars, 387 forks, 234 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tork has 821 stars, 66 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. Inngest leads on adoption by 633% (6,017 vs 821 stars). Inngest is written in Go under a custom or non-standard licence; tork is written in Go under MIT. Inngest has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, tork 8%. Inngest was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (workflow-engine), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Inngest ★ 6.0K tork ★ 821 category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Inngest tork
GitHub stars ★ 6.0K ★ 821
License Custom / other MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-11-04 2026-10-30
Forks ⑂ 387 ⑂ 66
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Inngest if

  • You weight community size — 6.0K stars and counting
  • You want the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Inngest profile →

pick tork if

  • You want the tork feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and tork fits your workflow better

full tork profile →

About Inngest

Inngest's durable functions replace queues, state management, and scheduling to enable any developer to write reliable step functions faster without touching infrastructure. 1. Write durable functions using any of our language SDKs 2. Run the Inngest Dev Server for a complete local development experience, with production parity. 3. Deploy your functions to your own infrastructure 4. Sync your application's functions with the Inngest Platform or a self hosted Inngest server. 5. Inngest invokes your functions securely via HTTPS whenever triggering events are received. An example durable function Inngest Functions…

read the full Inngest overview →

About tork

Features • Quick Start • Installation • Architecture • Jobs • Tasks • Configuration • REST API • Web UI • Extend Tork is a highly scalable, general purpose workflow engine. It lets you define jobs consisting of multiple tasks, each running inside its own container. You can run Tork on a single machine (standalone mode) or set it up in a distributed environment with multiple workers. Features REST API – Submit jobs, query status, cancel/restart Horizontally scalable – Add workers to handle more tasks Task isolation – Tasks run in containers for isolation, idempotency, and resource limits Automatic recovery –…

read the full tork overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

Frequently asked questions

Is Inngest or tork more popular?

Inngest has 6,017 GitHub stars and tork has 821. Inngest has the larger community by that measure.

Are Inngest and tork free?

Both are open source. Inngest has no licence declared in this registry, and tork is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between Inngest and tork?

Inngest is written in Go and tork in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Inngest or tork?

Choose Inngest if you want the larger community (6,017 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose tork if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.