head to head · open source
Inngest vs tork
Inngest has 5,853 GitHub stars, 358 forks, 234 open issues and last shipped yesterday. tork has 817 stars, 63 forks, 20 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Inngest leads on adoption by 616% (5,853 vs 817 stars). Inngest is written in Go under a custom or non-standard licence; tork is written in Go under MIT. Inngest has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, tork 8%. Inngest was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (workflow-engine), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Inngest | tork | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 5.9K | ★ 817 |
| License | Custom / other | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-09-19 | 2026-07-21 |
| Forks | ⑂ 358 | ⑂ 63 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Inngest if
- You weight community size — 5.9K stars and counting
- You want the Custom / other license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick tork if
- You want the tork feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and tork fits your workflow better
About Inngest
Inngest is an open source workflow orchestration platform that lets developers write durable, event driven step functions in their existing language SDKs and run them on serverless, long running servers, or the edge.
read the full Inngest overview →
About tork
Tork is a lightweight, distributed workflow engine written in Go and released under the MIT license. It runs each task of a job as a script inside its own container, so work is defined in YAML rather than as compiled code. The project lives in the Go ecosystem and uses Docker, Podman, or a plain shell as its task runtime, with PostgreSQL as the datastore and a message broker such as RabbitMQ for distributed operation.
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Orchestration & Scheduling projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Inngest or tork more popular?
Inngest has 5,853 GitHub stars and tork has 817. Inngest has the larger community by that measure.
Are Inngest and tork free?
Both are open source. Inngest has no licence declared in this registry, and tork is licensed under MIT. Both are free to self-host.
What is the difference between Inngest and tork?
Inngest is written in Go and tork in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Inngest or tork?
Choose Inngest if you want the larger community (5,853 stars) or its Custom / other licence terms. Choose tork if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.