head to head · open source

rancher vs Inngest

rancher has 25,924 GitHub stars, 3,221 forks, 3,371 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Inngest has 5,853 stars, 358 forks, 234 open issues and last shipped yesterday. rancher leads on adoption by 343% (25,924 vs 5,853 stars). rancher is written in Go under Apache-2.0; Inngest is written in Go under a custom or non-standard licence. rancher has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, Inngest 6%. rancher was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

rancher ★ 26K Inngest ★ 5.9K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

rancher Inngest
GitHub stars ★ 26K ★ 5.9K
License Apache-2.0 Custom / other
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 3.2K ⑂ 358
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick rancher if

  • You weight community size — 26K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full rancher profile →

pick Inngest if

  • You want the Inngest feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and Inngest fits your workflow better

full Inngest profile →

About rancher

Rancher is an Apache 2.0 licensed, Go based open source container management platform for organizations that deploy containers in production and need to run Kubernetes everywhere while meeting IT requirements and empowering DevOps teams.

read the full rancher overview →

About Inngest

Inngest is an open source workflow orchestration platform that lets developers write durable, event driven step functions in their existing language SDKs and run them on serverless, long running servers, or the edge.

read the full Inngest overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

kubernetes vs rancher n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

rancher vs ansible rancher vs compose rancher vs conductor rancher vs xxl-job rancher vs gitleaks rancher vs Kestra rancher vs haystack rancher vs Prefect rancher vs Archon rancher vs Temporal rancher vs rowboat rancher vs Trigger

Frequently asked questions

Is rancher or Inngest more popular?

rancher has 25,924 GitHub stars and Inngest has 5,853. rancher has the larger community by that measure.

Are rancher and Inngest free?

Both are open source. rancher is licensed under Apache-2.0, and Inngest has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between rancher and Inngest?

rancher is written in Go and Inngest in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, rancher or Inngest?

Choose rancher if you want the larger community (25,924 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose Inngest if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.