head to head · open source
huginn vs nezha
huginn has 50,269 GitHub stars, 4,339 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped yesterday. nezha has 10,390 stars, 1,616 forks, 54 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. huginn leads on adoption by 384% (50,269 vs 10,390 stars). huginn is written in Ruby under MIT; nezha is written in Go under WTFPL. huginn has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, nezha 16%. huginn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| huginn | nezha | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 10K |
| License | MIT | WTFPL |
| Written in | Ruby | Go |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-29 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.3K | ⑂ 1.6K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick huginn if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick nezha if
- You want the nezha feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the WTFPL license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and nezha fits your workflow better
About huginn
What is Huginn? Huginn is a system for building agents that perform automated tasks for you online. They can read the web, watch for events, and take actions on your behalf. Huginn's Agents create and consume events, propagating them along a directed graph. Think of it as a hackable version of IFTTT or Zapier on your own server. You always know who has your data. You do. Here are some of the things that you can do with Huginn: Track the weather and get an email when it's going to rain (or snow) tomorrow ("Don't forget your umbrella!") List terms that you care about and receive email when their occurrence on…
read the full huginn overview →
About nezha
LOGO designed by 熊大 . :trollface: Nezha Monitoring: Self hostable, lightweight, servers and websites monitoring and O&M tool. Supports monitoring system status, HTTP (SSL certificate change, upcoming expiration, expired), TCP, Ping and supports push alerts , run scheduled tasks and web terminal . \ Telegram Channel: 哪吒监控（中文通知频道） \ Telegram Group: Nezha Monitoring Global (English Only), 哪吒监控（中文群组） \ Use Cases 我们的用户 (Google) Sponsors / 赞助商 VMRack 洛杉矶 VPS｜CN2 GIA + AS9929 + CMIN2 三网精品线路，AMD + NVMe 高性能！ 👉 vmrack 🚀 99CDN｜自建 CDN，不止是加速！ 边缘缓存 + 智能调度 + 自动故障切换 + 商业化运营 🌐 99cdn AxisNow｜自建私有部署 CDN｜订阅式高防 CDN 自主可控、灵活组合的 CDN…
read the full nezha overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is huginn or nezha more popular?
huginn has 50,269 GitHub stars and nezha has 10,390. huginn has the larger community by that measure.
Are huginn and nezha free?
Both are open source. huginn is licensed under MIT and nezha under WTFPL. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between huginn and nezha?
huginn is written in Ruby and nezha in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, huginn or nezha?
Choose huginn if you want the larger community (50,269 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose nezha if its feature set, stack or WTFPL licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.