head to head · open source
huginn vs moosestack
huginn has 50,269 GitHub stars, 4,339 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped yesterday. moosestack has 591 stars, 32 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. huginn leads on adoption by 8,406% (50,269 vs 591 stars). huginn is written in Ruby under MIT; moosestack is written in Rust under MIT. huginn has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, moosestack 5%. huginn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| huginn | moosestack | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 591 |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Ruby | Rust |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-28 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.3K | ⑂ 32 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick huginn if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick moosestack if
- You want the moosestack feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Rust
- You evaluated both and moosestack fits your workflow better
About huginn
What is Huginn? Huginn is a system for building agents that perform automated tasks for you online. They can read the web, watch for events, and take actions on your behalf. Huginn's Agents create and consume events, propagating them along a directed graph. Think of it as a hackable version of IFTTT or Zapier on your own server. You always know who has your data. You do. Here are some of the things that you can do with Huginn: Track the weather and get an email when it's going to rain (or snow) tomorrow ("Don't forget your umbrella!") List terms that you care about and receive email when their occurrence on…
read the full huginn overview →
About moosestack
[!IMPORTANT] MooseStack has reached end of life and is no longer actively maintained. As users, we loved the idea of the MooseStack harness. But as coding agents became our primary users over the last couple of years, results from the Agent Experience Platform (AXP) made it clear that they would rather free solo on the underlying tools than use our product. We cannot in good faith keep building tools that make their work harder. Thank you to everyone who supported MooseStack and helped us test the idea. You can learn more about AXP in the docs. MooseStack The developer agent harness for ClickHouse — MooseStack…
read the full moosestack overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is huginn or moosestack more popular?
huginn has 50,269 GitHub stars and moosestack has 591. huginn has the larger community by that measure.
Are huginn and moosestack free?
Both are open source. huginn is licensed under MIT and moosestack under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between huginn and moosestack?
huginn is written in Ruby and moosestack in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, huginn or moosestack?
Choose huginn if you want the larger community (50,269 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose moosestack if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.