head to head · open source

huginn vs karma

huginn has 49,969 GitHub stars, 4,299 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped yesterday. karma has 2,682 stars, 203 forks, 39 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. huginn leads on adoption by 1,763% (49,969 vs 2,682 stars). huginn is written in Ruby under MIT; karma is written in TypeScript under Apache-2.0. huginn has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, karma 8%. huginn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (monitoring), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

huginn ★ 50K karma ★ 2.7K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 13541 open source comparisons

Side by side

huginn karma
GitHub stars ★ 50K ★ 2.7K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Ruby TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-18 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 4.3K ⑂ 203
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick huginn if

  • You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Ruby
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full huginn profile →

pick karma if

  • You want the karma feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and karma fits your workflow better

full karma profile →

About huginn

Huginn is an open source system for building agents that perform automated tasks online, written in Ruby and released under the MIT license. Its agents read the web, watch for events, and take actions on the user's behalf. Internally, agents create and consume events that propagate along a directed graph, which means one agent's output becomes another agent's input and a chain of small steps can be composed into a larger workflow. The project lives in the Ruby ecosystem and is distributed as an official Docker image or installed locally from a forked repository.

read the full huginn overview →

About karma

karma is an open source alert dashboard for Prometheus Alertmanager, written in TypeScript and released under the Apache 2.0 licence, built for teams that run Prometheus based alerting and find the Alertmanager UI too limited for day to day alert triage.

read the full karma overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack llama-index vs haystack compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job langgraph vs haystack compose vs gitleaks trivy vs gitleaks supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

huginn vs Uptime Kuma huginn vs worldmonitor huginn vs NetData huginn vs Grafana huginn vs Sentry huginn vs SigNoz huginn vs Grafana Loki huginn vs beszel huginn vs cilium huginn vs Apache SkyWalking huginn vs jaeger huginn vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is huginn or karma more popular?

huginn has 49,969 GitHub stars and karma has 2,682. huginn has the larger community by that measure.

Are huginn and karma free?

Both are open source. huginn is licensed under MIT and karma under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between huginn and karma?

huginn is written in Ruby and karma in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, huginn or karma?

Choose huginn if you want the larger community (49,969 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose karma if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.