head to head · open source
huginn vs codeburn
huginn has 49,967 GitHub stars, 4,298 forks, 698 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. codeburn has 11,063 stars, 839 forks, 39 open issues and last shipped yesterday. huginn leads on adoption by 352% (49,967 vs 11,063 stars). huginn is written in Ruby under MIT; codeburn is written in TypeScript under MIT. huginn has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, codeburn 8%. codeburn was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 8884 open source comparisons
Side by side
| huginn | codeburn | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 50K | ★ 11K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Ruby | TypeScript |
| Last push | 2026-09-16 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 4.3K | ⑂ 839 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick huginn if
- You weight community size — 50K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Ruby
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick codeburn if
- You want the codeburn feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches TypeScript
- You evaluated both and codeburn fits your workflow better
About huginn
Huginn is an open source system for building agents that perform automated tasks online, written in Ruby and released under the MIT license. Its agents read the web, watch for events, and take actions on the user's behalf. Internally, agents create and consume events that propagate along a directed graph, which means one agent's output becomes another agent's input and a chain of small steps can be composed into a larger workflow. The project lives in the Ruby ecosystem and is distributed as an official Docker image or installed locally from a forked repository.
read the full huginn overview →
About codeburn
CodeBurn is a free, open source, local first tool that tracks AI coding token usage and cost across 41 tools and agents, including Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, Gemini, and Grok. It is written in TypeScript, licensed under MIT, and lives in the developer tools and observability ecosystem as a command line utility with optional desktop surfaces. Every surface reads the session files that the supported tools already write to disk, so CodeBurn acts as one source of truth rather than a separate collection layer.
read the full codeburn overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is huginn or codeburn more popular?
huginn has 49,967 GitHub stars and codeburn has 11,063. huginn has the larger community by that measure.
Are huginn and codeburn free?
Both are open source. huginn is licensed under MIT and codeburn under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between huginn and codeburn?
huginn is written in Ruby and codeburn in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, huginn or codeburn?
Choose huginn if you want the larger community (49,967 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose codeburn if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.