head to head · open source

DBeaver vs HeidiSQL

DBeaver has 51,814 GitHub stars, 4,374 forks, 3,334 open issues and last shipped yesterday. HeidiSQL has 6,274 stars, 587 forks, 324 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. DBeaver leads on adoption by 726% (51,814 vs 6,274 stars). DBeaver is written in Java under Apache-2.0; HeidiSQL is written in Pascal under GPL-2.0. DBeaver has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, HeidiSQL 9%. DBeaver was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

DBeaver ★ 52K HeidiSQL ★ 6.3K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

DBeaver HeidiSQL
GitHub stars ★ 52K ★ 6.3K
License Apache-2.0 GPL-2.0
Written in Java Pascal
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 4.4K ⑂ 587
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick DBeaver if

  • You weight community size — 52K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full DBeaver profile →

pick HeidiSQL if

  • You want the HeidiSQL feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Pascal
  • You evaluated both and HeidiSQL fits your workflow better

full HeidiSQL profile →

About DBeaver

DBeaver is a free, multi platform database management tool built in Java, designed for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators, and analysts. It operates across Windows, macOS, and Linux and integrates with the Eclipse based plugin ecosystem via OSGi and Eclipse RCP frameworks.

read the full DBeaver overview →

About HeidiSQL

HeidiSQL is a free, GPL 2.0 licensed graphical client for managing MariaDB, MySQL, Microsoft SQL Server, PostgreSQL, SQLite, Interbase and Firebird databases, aimed at developers and database administrators who need to browse, edit and export data without working from a command line.

read the full HeidiSQL overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

mall vs dbeaver supabase vs nocodb mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb supabase vs postgrest mall vs etcd mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra

More Databases projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Databases field.

DBeaver vs mall DBeaver vs Prometheus DBeaver vs NocoDB DBeaver vs etcd DBeaver vs orm DBeaver vs Milvus DBeaver vs TiDB DBeaver vs drawDB DBeaver vs typeorm DBeaver vs AnotherRedisDesktopManager DBeaver vs Qdrant DBeaver vs rocksdb

Frequently asked questions

Is DBeaver or HeidiSQL more popular?

DBeaver has 51,814 GitHub stars and HeidiSQL has 6,274. DBeaver has the larger community by that measure.

Are DBeaver and HeidiSQL free?

Both are open source. DBeaver is licensed under Apache-2.0 and HeidiSQL under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between DBeaver and HeidiSQL?

DBeaver is written in Java and HeidiSQL in Pascal. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, DBeaver or HeidiSQL?

Choose DBeaver if you want the larger community (51,814 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose HeidiSQL if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.