head to head · open source

compose vs haystack

compose has 38,175 GitHub stars, 5,817 forks, 111 open issues and last shipped yesterday. haystack has 26,531 stars, 3,144 forks, 143 open issues and last shipped yesterday. compose leads on adoption by 44% (38,175 vs 26,531 stars). compose is written in Go under Apache-2.0; haystack is written in Python under Apache-2.0. compose has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, haystack 12%. compose was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

compose ★ 38K haystack ★ 27K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

compose haystack
GitHub stars ★ 38K ★ 27K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.8K ⑂ 3.1K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick compose if

  • You weight community size — 38K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full compose profile →

pick haystack if

  • You want the haystack feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and haystack fits your workflow better

full haystack profile →

About compose

Docker Compose is an Apache 2.0 licensed Go tool that defines and runs multi container applications on Docker from a single Compose file, aimed at developers and operators who need several containers to start together as one isolated application.

read the full compose overview →

About haystack

Haystack is an open source AI orchestration framework written in Python under the Apache 2.0 licence, for building context engineered, production ready large language model applications as modular pipelines and agent workflows with explicit control over retrieval, routing, memory, and generation, and it is aimed at developers and teams building scalable agents, retrieval augmented generation, multimodal applications, semantic search, question answering, and conversational systems.

read the full haystack overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs kestra compose vs rancher compose vs prefect conductor vs xxl-job uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus

More Orchestration & Scheduling projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Orchestration & Scheduling field.

compose vs conductor compose vs xxl-job compose vs gitleaks compose vs Kestra compose vs rancher compose vs Prefect compose vs Archon compose vs Temporal compose vs rowboat compose vs Trigger compose vs dolphinscheduler compose vs agent-framework

Frequently asked questions

Is compose or haystack more popular?

compose has 38,175 GitHub stars and haystack has 26,531. compose has the larger community by that measure.

Are compose and haystack free?

Both are open source. compose is licensed under Apache-2.0 and haystack under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between compose and haystack?

compose is written in Go and haystack in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, compose or haystack?

Choose compose if you want the larger community (38,175 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose haystack if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.