head to head · open source

Grok Build vs SWE-agent

Grok Build has 26,820 GitHub stars, 5,048 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. SWE-agent has 20,344 stars, 2,224 forks, 102 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. Grok Build leads on adoption by 32% (26,820 vs 20,344 stars). Grok Build is written in Rust under Apache-2.0; SWE-agent is written in Python under MIT. Grok Build has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, SWE-agent 11%. Grok Build was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grok Build ★ 27K SWE-agent ★ 20K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grok Build SWE-agent
GitHub stars ★ 27K ★ 20K
License Apache-2.0 MIT
Written in Rust Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 5.0K ⑂ 2.2K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grok Build if

  • You weight community size — 27K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grok Build profile →

pick SWE-agent if

  • You want the SWE-agent feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and SWE-agent fits your workflow better

full SWE-agent profile →

About Grok Build

Grok Build is a terminal based AI coding agent developed by SpaceXAI, distributed as the grok CLI/TUI. It operates as a fullscreen, mouse interactive interface that integrates with the user’s codebase to perform code editing, command execution, web search, and long running task orchestration. The project lives in the Rust ecosystem and is licensed under Apache 2.0.

read the full Grok Build overview →

About SWE-agent

SWE agent is a Python, MIT licensed open source project in the AI assisted coding and agent ecosystem. It is an agent based model for developer tools that takes a GitHub issue and tries to automatically fix it using a chosen language model. The project is associated with NeurIPS 2024 and is maintained by researchers from Princeton University and Stanford University.

read the full SWE-agent overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode langflow vs supabase langflow vs pocketbase langflow vs tooljet langflow vs appsmith langflow vs tiptap langflow vs directus langflow vs budibase langflow vs onlook

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

Grok Build vs OpenCode Grok Build vs pi Grok Build vs OpenHands Grok Build vs Paperclip Grok Build vs Orca Grok Build vs Cline Grok Build vs Aider Grok Build vs Continue Grok Build vs Tabby Grok Build vs T3 Code Grok Build vs Dyad Grok Build vs Paseo

Frequently asked questions

Is Grok Build or SWE-agent more popular?

Grok Build has 26,820 GitHub stars and SWE-agent has 20,344. Grok Build has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grok Build and SWE-agent free?

Both are open source. Grok Build is licensed under Apache-2.0 and SWE-agent under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grok Build and SWE-agent?

Grok Build is written in Rust and SWE-agent in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grok Build or SWE-agent?

Choose Grok Build if you want the larger community (26,820 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose SWE-agent if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.