head to head · open source

OpenCode vs Grok Build

OpenCode has 208,150 GitHub stars, 27,350 forks, 5,727 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Grok Build has 26,820 stars, 5,048 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. OpenCode leads on adoption by 676% (208,150 vs 26,820 stars). OpenCode is written in TypeScript under MIT; Grok Build is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. OpenCode has attracted 13% as many forks as stars, Grok Build 19%. OpenCode was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

OpenCode ★ 208K Grok Build ★ 27K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

OpenCode Grok Build
GitHub stars ★ 208K ★ 27K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 27K ⑂ 5.0K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick OpenCode if

  • You weight community size — 208K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full OpenCode profile →

pick Grok Build if

  • You want the Grok Build feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Grok Build fits your workflow better

full Grok Build profile →

About OpenCode

OpenCode is an open source AI coding agent designed to operate across terminal, IDE, and desktop environments. It integrates directly into developer workflows to assist with writing, editing, and understanding code using natural language prompts. Built in TypeScript and licensed under MIT, it runs locally or via a desktop app and supports multiple languages and platforms.

read the full OpenCode overview →

About Grok Build

Grok Build is a terminal based AI coding agent developed by SpaceXAI, distributed as the grok CLI/TUI. It operates as a fullscreen, mouse interactive interface that integrates with the user’s codebase to perform code editing, command execution, web search, and long running task orchestration. The project lives in the Rust ecosystem and is licensed under Apache 2.0.

read the full Grok Build overview →

More in Developer Tools

Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K Zed ★ 90K

Related comparisons

opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit opencode vs nango opencode vs jitsu opencode vs aci-dev opencode vs convertigo opencode vs orbital opencode vs hercules opencode vs argos langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode langflow vs supabase

More AI Assisted Coding projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the AI Assisted Coding field.

OpenCode vs pi OpenCode vs OpenHands OpenCode vs Paperclip OpenCode vs Orca OpenCode vs Cline OpenCode vs Aider OpenCode vs Continue OpenCode vs Tabby OpenCode vs T3 Code OpenCode vs Dyad OpenCode vs SWE-agent OpenCode vs Paseo

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenCode or Grok Build more popular?

OpenCode has 208,150 GitHub stars and Grok Build has 26,820. OpenCode has the larger community by that measure.

Are OpenCode and Grok Build free?

Both are open source. OpenCode is licensed under MIT and Grok Build under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between OpenCode and Grok Build?

OpenCode is written in TypeScript and Grok Build in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, OpenCode or Grok Build?

Choose OpenCode if you want the larger community (208,150 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose Grok Build if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.