head to head · open source

Grafana Loki vs EasyLogger

Grafana Loki has 28,917 GitHub stars, 4,115 forks, 1,620 open issues and last shipped yesterday. EasyLogger has 4,750 stars, 1,317 forks, 81 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. Grafana Loki leads on adoption by 509% (28,917 vs 4,750 stars). Grafana Loki is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; EasyLogger is written in C under MIT. Grafana Loki has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, EasyLogger 28%. Grafana Loki was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (logging), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Grafana Loki ★ 29K EasyLogger ★ 4.8K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Grafana Loki EasyLogger
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 4.8K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go C
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-08-13
Forks ⑂ 4.1K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Grafana Loki if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Grafana Loki profile →

pick EasyLogger if

  • You want the EasyLogger feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C
  • You evaluated both and EasyLogger fits your workflow better

full EasyLogger profile →

About Grafana Loki

Grafana Loki is a log aggregation system designed as the log oriented counterpart to Prometheus. It operates within the cloud native observability ecosystem, specifically targeting Kubernetes and containerized environments. Loki avoids expensive full text indexing by indexing only metadata labels attached to log streams, storing the raw log content in compressed form. This design choice makes Loki significantly simpler to operate and more cost effective than traditional log systems that index every word.

read the full Grafana Loki overview →

About EasyLogger

EasyLogger is an ultra lightweight, high performance C/C++ logging library with a footprint under 1.6 KB of ROM and 0.3 KB of RAM, aimed at embedded and resource constrained developers who need structured, filterable logs on devices where a full logging framework will not fit.

read the full EasyLogger overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

kubernetes ★ 128K Immich ★ 115K frp ★ 110K Uptime Kuma ★ 92K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K

Related comparisons

n8n vs huginn uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana uptime-kuma vs prometheus netdata vs grafana n8n vs kestra langchain vs haystack kubernetes vs rancher ansible vs compose ansible vs conductor ansible vs xxl-job ansible vs gitleaks ansible vs kestra kubernetes vs docker kubernetes vs kong kubernetes vs portainer kubernetes vs trivy kubernetes vs opentofu kubernetes vs jenkins kubernetes vs pulumi kubernetes vs floci

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Grafana Loki vs Uptime Kuma Grafana Loki vs worldmonitor Grafana Loki vs NetData Grafana Loki vs Grafana Grafana Loki vs huginn Grafana Loki vs Sentry Grafana Loki vs SigNoz Grafana Loki vs beszel Grafana Loki vs cilium Grafana Loki vs Apache SkyWalking Grafana Loki vs jaeger Grafana Loki vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Grafana Loki or EasyLogger more popular?

Grafana Loki has 28,917 GitHub stars and EasyLogger has 4,750. Grafana Loki has the larger community by that measure.

Are Grafana Loki and EasyLogger free?

Both are open source. Grafana Loki is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and EasyLogger under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Grafana Loki and EasyLogger?

Grafana Loki is written in Go and EasyLogger in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Grafana Loki or EasyLogger?

Choose Grafana Loki if you want the larger community (28,917 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose EasyLogger if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.