head to head · open source
Gogs vs brooks-lint
Gogs has 47,897 GitHub stars, 5,075 forks, 1,009 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. brooks-lint has 1,542 stars, 72 forks, 0 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Gogs leads on adoption by 3,006% (47,897 vs 1,542 stars). Gogs is written in Go under MIT; brooks-lint is written in HTML under MIT. Gogs has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, brooks-lint 5%. brooks-lint was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Gogs | brooks-lint | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 48K | ★ 1.5K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | HTML |
| Last push | 2026-10-21 | 2026-10-24 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 72 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Gogs if
- You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick brooks-lint if
- You want the brooks-lint feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches HTML
- You evaluated both and brooks-lint fits your workflow better
About Gogs
👉 Deploy on DigitalOcean and get $200 in free credits ! 🔮 Vision The Gogs ( /gɑgz/ ) project aims to build a simple, stable and extensible self hosted Git service that can be set up in the most painless way. With Go, this can be done with an independent binary distribution across all platforms that Go supports, including Linux, macOS, Windows and ARM based systems. 📡 Overview Please visit our home page for user documentation. Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for list of changes in each releases. Want to try it before doing anything else? Do it online! Having trouble? Help yourself with troubleshooting or ask…
About brooks-lint
brooks lint AI code reviews grounded in twelve classic engineering books. Consistent. Traceable. Actionable. English · 简体中文 · 繁體中文 · 日本語 · 한국어 · Español Quick Start • The Six Decay Risks • What It Looks Like • Benchmark • Installation → Visit the website "The bearing of a child takes nine months, no matter how many women are assigned." — Frederick Brooks, The Mythical Man Month (1975) 50 years later, Brooks was still right — and so were McConnell, Fowler, Martin, Hunt & Thomas, Evans, Ousterhout, Winters, Meszaros, Osherove, Feathers, and the Google Testing team. Most code quality tools count lines and…
read the full brooks-lint overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gogs or brooks-lint more popular?
Gogs has 47,897 GitHub stars and brooks-lint has 1,542. Gogs has the larger community by that measure.
Are Gogs and brooks-lint free?
Both are open source. Gogs is licensed under MIT and brooks-lint under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Gogs and brooks-lint?
Gogs is written in Go and brooks-lint in HTML. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Gogs or brooks-lint?
Choose Gogs if you want the larger community (47,897 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose brooks-lint if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.