head to head · open source
Gogs vs reviewdog
Gogs has 47,914 GitHub stars, 5,076 forks, 1,009 open issues and last shipped 3 days ago. reviewdog has 9,716 stars, 512 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Gogs leads on adoption by 393% (47,914 vs 9,716 stars). Gogs is written in Go under MIT; reviewdog is written in Go under MIT. Gogs has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, reviewdog 5%. reviewdog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (go), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Gogs | reviewdog | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 48K | ★ 9.7K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Go |
| Last push | 2026-10-31 | 2026-11-02 |
| Forks | ⑂ 5.1K | ⑂ 512 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Gogs if
- You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick reviewdog if
- You want the reviewdog feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You evaluated both and reviewdog fits your workflow better
About Gogs
👉 Deploy on DigitalOcean and get $200 in free credits ! 🔮 Vision The Gogs ( /gɑgz/ ) project aims to build a simple, stable and extensible self hosted Git service that can be set up in the most painless way. With Go, this can be done with an independent binary distribution across all platforms that Go supports, including Linux, macOS, Windows and ARM based systems. 📡 Overview Please visit our home page for user documentation. Please refer to CHANGELOG.md for list of changes in each releases. Want to try it before doing anything else? Do it online! Having trouble? Help yourself with troubleshooting or ask…
About reviewdog
reviewdog A code review dog who keeps your codebase healthy. reviewdog provides a way to post review comments to code hosting services, such as GitHub, automatically by integrating with any linter tools with ease. It uses an output of lint tools and posts them as a comment if findings are in the diff of patches to review. reviewdog also supports running in the local environment to filter the output of lint tools by diff. design doc Table of Contents Installation Input Format 'errorformat' Available pre defined 'errorformat' Reviewdog Diagnostic Format (RDFormat) Diff checkstyle format SARIF format Code…
read the full reviewdog overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gogs or reviewdog more popular?
Gogs has 47,914 GitHub stars and reviewdog has 9,716. Gogs has the larger community by that measure.
Are Gogs and reviewdog free?
Both are open source. Gogs is licensed under MIT and reviewdog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Gogs and reviewdog?
Gogs is written in Go and reviewdog in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Gogs or reviewdog?
Choose Gogs if you want the larger community (47,914 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose reviewdog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.