head to head · open source

Gogs vs reviewdog

Gogs has 47,821 GitHub stars, 5,069 forks, 1,009 open issues and last shipped 6 days ago. reviewdog has 9,597 stars, 494 forks, 131 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Gogs leads on adoption by 398% (47,821 vs 9,597 stars). Gogs is written in Go under MIT; reviewdog is written in Go under MIT. Gogs has attracted 11% as many forks as stars, reviewdog 5%. reviewdog was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (go), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Gogs ★ 48K reviewdog ★ 9.6K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Gogs reviewdog
GitHub stars ★ 48K ★ 9.6K
License MIT MIT
Written in Go Go
Last push 2026-09-12 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 5.1K ⑂ 494
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Gogs if

  • You weight community size — 48K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Gogs profile →

pick reviewdog if

  • You want the reviewdog feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and reviewdog fits your workflow better

full reviewdog profile →

About Gogs

Gogs is a self hosted Git service written in Go and released under the MIT licence, aimed at individuals and small teams who want their own repository hosting without adopting a full collaboration platform.

read the full Gogs overview →

About reviewdog

reviewdog is an automated code review tool written in Go and released under the MIT license. It lives in the version control and collaboration space of the developer tooling ecosystem, and it integrates with code analysis tools regardless of programming language. Rather than performing analysis itself, reviewdog consumes the output of existing linters and static analysis tools and turns those findings into review comments on code hosting services. The project has been published for roughly ten years, carries more than nine thousand stars and close to five hundred forks, and its topic list covers CI, linting, stat…

read the full reviewdog overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

gitea vs gogs gogs vs code-review-graph gogs vs open-code-review gitea vs code-review-graph gitea vs open-code-review gitea vs reflex gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

Gogs vs Gitea Gogs vs open-code-review Gogs vs code-review-graph Gogs vs Reflex Gogs vs GitLab Gogs vs GitButler Gogs vs Coder Gogs vs gitpod Gogs vs pr-agent Gogs vs Encore Gogs vs hunk Gogs vs plannotator

Frequently asked questions

Is Gogs or reviewdog more popular?

Gogs has 47,821 GitHub stars and reviewdog has 9,597. Gogs has the larger community by that measure.

Are Gogs and reviewdog free?

Both are open source. Gogs is licensed under MIT and reviewdog under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Gogs and reviewdog?

Gogs is written in Go and reviewdog in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Gogs or reviewdog?

Choose Gogs if you want the larger community (47,821 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose reviewdog if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.