head to head · open source
gofr vs EasyLogger
gofr has 20,909 GitHub stars, 1,760 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. EasyLogger has 4,750 stars, 1,317 forks, 81 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. gofr leads on adoption by 340% (20,909 vs 4,750 stars). gofr is written in Go under Apache-2.0; EasyLogger is written in C under MIT. gofr has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, EasyLogger 28%. gofr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (logging), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| gofr | EasyLogger | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 4.8K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | C |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-08-13 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.8K | ⑂ 1.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick gofr if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick EasyLogger if
- You want the EasyLogger feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches C
- You evaluated both and EasyLogger fits your workflow better
About gofr
GoFr is an opinionated Go framework for building microservices, aimed at Go developers and platform teams who want HTTP, gRPC, data access and observability built in rather than assembled from separate libraries.
About EasyLogger
EasyLogger is an ultra lightweight, high performance C/C++ logging library with a footprint under 1.6 KB of ROM and 0.3 KB of RAM, aimed at embedded and resource constrained developers who need structured, filterable logs on devices where a full logging framework will not fit.
read the full EasyLogger overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is gofr or EasyLogger more popular?
gofr has 20,909 GitHub stars and EasyLogger has 4,750. gofr has the larger community by that measure.
Are gofr and EasyLogger free?
Both are open source. gofr is licensed under Apache-2.0 and EasyLogger under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between gofr and EasyLogger?
gofr is written in Go and EasyLogger in C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, gofr or EasyLogger?
Choose gofr if you want the larger community (20,909 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose EasyLogger if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.