head to head · open source

Apache SkyWalking vs gofr

Apache SkyWalking has 24,955 GitHub stars, 6,634 forks, 41 open issues and last shipped yesterday. gofr has 20,916 stars, 1,759 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Apache SkyWalking leads on adoption by 19% (24,955 vs 20,916 stars). Apache SkyWalking is written in Java under Apache-2.0; gofr is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Apache SkyWalking has attracted 27% as many forks as stars, gofr 8%. gofr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (logging, metrics), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Apache SkyWalking ★ 25K gofr ★ 21K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Apache SkyWalking gofr
GitHub stars ★ 25K ★ 21K
License Apache-2.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Java Go
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-17
Forks ⑂ 6.6K ⑂ 1.8K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Apache SkyWalking if

  • You weight community size — 25K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Apache SkyWalking profile →

pick gofr if

  • You want the gofr feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and gofr fits your workflow better

full gofr profile →

About Apache SkyWalking

Apache SkyWalking is an open source application performance monitoring (APM) system for distributed systems in cloud native architectures, built for teams that run microservices across Kubernetes and container based environments.

read the full Apache SkyWalking overview →

About gofr

GoFr is an opinionated Go framework for building microservices, aimed at Go developers and platform teams who want HTTP, gRPC, data access and observability built in rather than assembled from separate libraries.

read the full gofr overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Immich ★ 114K Uptime Kuma ★ 91K worldmonitor ★ 87K mall ★ 85K NetData ★ 81K Elasticsearch ★ 78K

Related comparisons

uptime-kuma vs worldmonitor uptime-kuma vs netdata uptime-kuma vs grafana worldmonitor vs netdata worldmonitor vs grafana netdata vs grafana uptime-kuma vs huginn worldmonitor vs huginn immich vs paperless-ngx immich vs ceph immich vs filestash immich vs garage immich vs storj immich vs alarik immich vs spinifex paperless-ngx vs ceph mall vs prometheus mall vs nocodb mall vs etcd mall vs dbeaver mall vs orm prometheus vs nocodb mall vs milvus mall vs tidb

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Apache SkyWalking vs Uptime Kuma Apache SkyWalking vs worldmonitor Apache SkyWalking vs NetData Apache SkyWalking vs Grafana Apache SkyWalking vs huginn Apache SkyWalking vs Sentry Apache SkyWalking vs SigNoz Apache SkyWalking vs Grafana Loki Apache SkyWalking vs beszel Apache SkyWalking vs cilium Apache SkyWalking vs jaeger Apache SkyWalking vs Vector

Frequently asked questions

Is Apache SkyWalking or gofr more popular?

Apache SkyWalking has 24,955 GitHub stars and gofr has 20,916. Apache SkyWalking has the larger community by that measure.

Are Apache SkyWalking and gofr free?

Both are open source. Apache SkyWalking is licensed under Apache-2.0 and gofr under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Apache SkyWalking and gofr?

Apache SkyWalking is written in Java and gofr in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Apache SkyWalking or gofr?

Choose Apache SkyWalking if you want the larger community (24,955 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose gofr if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.