head to head · open source
gofr vs CocoaLumberjack
gofr has 20,909 GitHub stars, 1,760 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. CocoaLumberjack has 13,320 stars, 2,274 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 4 days ago. gofr leads on adoption by 57% (20,909 vs 13,320 stars). gofr is written in Go under Apache-2.0; CocoaLumberjack is written in Objective-C under BSD-3-Clause. gofr has attracted 8% as many forks as stars, CocoaLumberjack 17%. gofr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (logging), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| gofr | CocoaLumberjack | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 21K | ★ 13K |
| License | Apache-2.0 | BSD-3-Clause |
| Written in | Go | Objective-C |
| Last push | 2026-09-18 | 2026-09-16 |
| Forks | ⑂ 1.8K | ⑂ 2.3K |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick gofr if
- You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
- You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick CocoaLumberjack if
- You want the CocoaLumberjack feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
- Your stack matches Objective-C
- You evaluated both and CocoaLumberjack fits your workflow better
About gofr
GoFr is an opinionated Go framework for building microservices, aimed at Go developers and platform teams who want HTTP, gRPC, data access and observability built in rather than assembled from separate libraries.
About CocoaLumberjack
CocoaLumberjack is a fast and flexible logging framework, written primarily in Objective C with first class Swift support, for applications targeting macOS, iOS, tvOS, watchOS and visionOS.
read the full CocoaLumberjack overview →
More in Infrastructure & Operations
Related comparisons
More Monitoring & Observability projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.
Frequently asked questions
Is gofr or CocoaLumberjack more popular?
gofr has 20,909 GitHub stars and CocoaLumberjack has 13,320. gofr has the larger community by that measure.
Are gofr and CocoaLumberjack free?
Both are open source. gofr is licensed under Apache-2.0 and CocoaLumberjack under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between gofr and CocoaLumberjack?
gofr is written in Go and CocoaLumberjack in Objective-C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, gofr or CocoaLumberjack?
Choose gofr if you want the larger community (20,909 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose CocoaLumberjack if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.