head to head · open source

gofr vs CocoaLumberjack

gofr has 20,817 GitHub stars, 1,790 forks, 132 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. CocoaLumberjack has 13,320 stars, 2,272 forks, 7 open issues and last shipped 8 days ago. gofr leads on adoption by 56% (20,817 vs 13,320 stars). gofr is written in Go under Apache-2.0; CocoaLumberjack is written in Objective-C under BSD-3-Clause. gofr has attracted 9% as many forks as stars, CocoaLumberjack 17%. gofr was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (logging), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

gofr ★ 21K CocoaLumberjack ★ 13K category Infrastructure & Operations

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

gofr CocoaLumberjack
GitHub stars ★ 21K ★ 13K
License Apache-2.0 BSD-3-Clause
Written in Go Objective-C
Last push 2026-11-03 2026-10-28
Forks ⑂ 1.8K ⑂ 2.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick gofr if

  • You weight community size — 21K stars and counting
  • You want the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full gofr profile →

pick CocoaLumberjack if

  • You want the CocoaLumberjack feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the BSD-3-Clause license terms
  • Your stack matches Objective-C
  • You evaluated both and CocoaLumberjack fits your workflow better

full CocoaLumberjack profile →

About gofr

Go Fr GoFr: An Opinionated Microservice Development Framework Listed in the CNCF Landscape 🎯 Goal GoFr is designed to simplify microservice development , with a key focus on Kubernetes deployment and out of the box observability . While capable of building generic applications, microservices remain at its core. 💡 Key Features 1. Simple API Syntax 2. REST Standards by Default 3. Configuration Management 4. Observability (Logs, Traces, Metrics) 5. Inbuilt Auth Middleware & Custom Middleware Support 6. gRPC Support 7. HTTP Service with Circuit Breaker Support 8. Pub/Sub 9. Health Check for All Datasources 10…

read the full gofr overview →

About CocoaLumberjack

CocoaLumberjack =============== CocoaLumberjack is a fast & simple, yet powerful & flexible logging framework for macOS, iOS, tvOS, watchOS and visionOS. How to get started First, install CocoaLumberjack via Swift Package Manager, CocoaPods, Carthage or manually. Then use DDOSLogger for iOS 10 and later, or DDTTYLogger and DDASLLogger for earlier versions to begin logging messages. Swift Package Manager As of CocoaLumberjack 3.6.0, you can use the Swift Package Manager as integration method. If you want to use the Swift Package Manager as integration method, either use Xcode to add the package dependency or add…

read the full CocoaLumberjack overview →

More in Infrastructure & Operations

Related comparisons

More Monitoring & Observability projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Monitoring & Observability field.

Frequently asked questions

Is gofr or CocoaLumberjack more popular?

gofr has 20,817 GitHub stars and CocoaLumberjack has 13,320. gofr has the larger community by that measure.

Are gofr and CocoaLumberjack free?

Both are open source. gofr is licensed under Apache-2.0 and CocoaLumberjack under BSD-3-Clause. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between gofr and CocoaLumberjack?

gofr is written in Go and CocoaLumberjack in Objective-C. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, gofr or CocoaLumberjack?

Choose gofr if you want the larger community (20,817 stars) or its Apache-2.0 licence terms. Choose CocoaLumberjack if its feature set, stack or BSD-3-Clause licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.