head to head · open source

Gitea vs mantis

Gitea has 58,048 GitHub stars, 7,153 forks, 2,455 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mantis has 1,574 stars, 154 forks, 1 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. Gitea leads on adoption by 3,588% (58,048 vs 1,574 stars). Gitea is written in Go under MIT; mantis is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Gitea has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, mantis 10%. Gitea was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Gitea ★ 58K mantis ★ 1.6K category Developer Tools

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Gitea mantis
GitHub stars ★ 58K ★ 1.6K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in Go Python
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-13
Forks ⑂ 7.2K ⑂ 154
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Gitea if

  • You weight community size — 58K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Gitea profile →

pick mantis if

  • You want the mantis feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and mantis fits your workflow better

full mantis profile →

About Gitea

Gitea is a self hosted, all in one software development service written in Go. It provides Git hosting, code review, issue tracking, project management (kanban), wiki, team collaboration, package registry, and CI/CD capabilities. The project aims to deliver a lightweight, painless alternative to larger platforms by running as a single binary across Linux, macOS, FreeBSD, OpenBSD, and Windows on multiple architectures.

read the full Gitea overview →

About mantis

Mantis is a modular, stack agnostic toolkit of security review skills for AI coding agents, and it includes an ADK reference harness for building secure software. It lives in the developer tools, AI coding agent, and application security ecosystem, with topics such as code review, DevSecOps, multi agent systems, and hardware security. The project helps agents autonomously find, reproduce, and patch vulnerabilities while giving humans a structured way to review results.

read the full mantis overview →

More in Developer Tools

OpenCode ★ 208K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K fastapi ★ 102K Neovim ★ 102K

Related comparisons

gitea vs gogs gitea vs code-review-graph gitea vs open-code-review gitea vs reflex gitea vs gitlab gitea vs gitbutler gogs vs code-review-graph gogs vs open-code-review opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip opencode vs orca opencode vs cline opencode vs aider opencode vs continue opencode vs tabby opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed langflow vs neovim langflow vs zed opencode vs kilocode opencode vs codeedit neovim vs zed langflow vs kilocode

More Version Control & Collaboration projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.

Gitea vs Gogs Gitea vs open-code-review Gitea vs code-review-graph Gitea vs Reflex Gitea vs GitLab Gitea vs GitButler Gitea vs Coder Gitea vs gitpod Gitea vs pr-agent Gitea vs Encore Gitea vs reviewdog Gitea vs hunk

Frequently asked questions

Is Gitea or mantis more popular?

Gitea has 58,048 GitHub stars and mantis has 1,574. Gitea has the larger community by that measure.

Are Gitea and mantis free?

Both are open source. Gitea is licensed under MIT and mantis under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Gitea and mantis?

Gitea is written in Go and mantis in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Gitea or mantis?

Choose Gitea if you want the larger community (58,048 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose mantis if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.