head to head · open source
Gitea vs BeautifulRust
Gitea has 58,737 GitHub stars, 7,316 forks, 2,455 open issues and last shipped yesterday. BeautifulRust has 1,327 stars, 59 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Gitea leads on adoption by 4,326% (58,737 vs 1,327 stars). Gitea is written in Go under MIT; BeautifulRust is written in Python under MIT. Gitea has attracted 12% as many forks as stars, BeautifulRust 4%. Gitea was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Gitea | BeautifulRust | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 59K | ★ 1.3K |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Written in | Go | Python |
| Last push | 2026-10-28 | 2026-10-27 |
| Forks | ⑂ 7.3K | ⑂ 59 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Gitea if
- You weight community size — 59K stars and counting
- You want the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick BeautifulRust if
- You want the BeautifulRust feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches Python
- You evaluated both and BeautifulRust fits your workflow better
About Gitea
Gitea 繁體中文 简体中文 Purpose The goal of Gitea is to make the easiest, fastest, and most painless way of setting up a self hosted all in one software development service, including Git hosting, code management, code review, issue tracking, project kanban, wiki, team collaboration, package registry and CI/CD which can reuse GitHub Actions. As Gitea is written in Go, it works across all the platforms and architectures that are supported by Go, including Linux, macOS, FreeBSD/OpenBSD and Windows on x86, amd64, ARM, RISC V 64 and PowerPC architectures. For online demonstrations, you can visit demo.gitea.com. For…
read the full Gitea overview →
About BeautifulRust
Beautiful Rust Three standard Agent Skills and a lints config that teach coding agents to write, review, port, and enforce idiomatic Rust: rust best practices loads whenever an agent writes or changes Rust, and steers it toward idiomatic, robust, maintainable code. rust review reviews existing Rust code, a file, a crate, or a diff, and writes a prioritized report where every finding cites the rule it breaks and shows the fix. rust port ports C, C++, Python, Go, or JavaScript to idiomatic Rust with the same behavior, porting the original tests first so you can prove the two match. lints/ is a drop in clippy…
read the full BeautifulRust overview →
More in Developer Tools
Related comparisons
More Version Control & Collaboration projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Version Control & Collaboration field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Gitea or BeautifulRust more popular?
Gitea has 58,737 GitHub stars and BeautifulRust has 1,327. Gitea has the larger community by that measure.
Are Gitea and BeautifulRust free?
Both are open source. Gitea is licensed under MIT and BeautifulRust under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Gitea and BeautifulRust?
Gitea is written in Go and BeautifulRust in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Gitea or BeautifulRust?
Choose Gitea if you want the larger community (58,737 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose BeautifulRust if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.