head to head · open source

Files vs zrok

Files has 45,547 GitHub stars, 2,920 forks, 458 open issues and last shipped today. zrok has 4,711 stars, 224 forks, 125 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Files leads on adoption by 867% (45,547 vs 4,711 stars). Files is written in C# under MIT; zrok is written in Go under Apache-2.0. Files has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, zrok 5%. Files was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Files ★ 46K zrok ★ 4.7K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Files zrok
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 4.7K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in C# Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-06-22
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 224
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Files if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Files profile →

pick zrok if

  • You want the zrok feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and zrok fits your workflow better

full zrok profile →

About Files

Files is a modern, MIT licensed file manager for Windows, written in C and maintained by an open source community, for Windows users who want a customizable, actively developed alternative for organising files and folders.

read the full Files overview →

About zrok

zrok is an open source, Apache 2.0 licensed secure sharing tool written in Go that lets developers, operators, and self hosters expose web services, folders, and TCP or UDP resources over the internet or to specific users without firewall changes or port forwarding.

read the full zrok overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Files vs LocalSend Files vs rclone Files vs copyparty Files vs yazi Files vs Spacedrive Files vs Nextcloud Files vs uppy Files vs cloudreve Files vs superfile Files vs ranger Files vs Seafile Files vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is Files or zrok more popular?

Files has 45,547 GitHub stars and zrok has 4,711. Files has the larger community by that measure.

Are Files and zrok free?

Both are open source. Files is licensed under MIT and zrok under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Files and zrok?

Files is written in C# and zrok in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Files or zrok?

Choose Files if you want the larger community (45,547 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose zrok if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.