head to head · open source

Files vs OxiCloud

Files has 45,524 GitHub stars, 2,918 forks, 458 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. OxiCloud has 3,576 stars, 170 forks, 94 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Files leads on adoption by 1,173% (45,524 vs 3,576 stars). Files is written in C# under MIT; OxiCloud is written in Rust under MIT. Files has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, OxiCloud 5%. OxiCloud was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Files ★ 46K OxiCloud ★ 3.6K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Files OxiCloud
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 3.6K
License MIT MIT
Written in C# Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 170
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Files if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Files profile →

pick OxiCloud if

  • You want the OxiCloud feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and OxiCloud fits your workflow better

full OxiCloud profile →

About Files

Files is a modern, MIT licensed file manager for Windows, written in C and maintained by an open source community, for Windows users who want a customizable, actively developed alternative for organising files and folders.

read the full Files overview →

About OxiCloud

OxiCloud is a self hosted cloud storage suite written in Rust that gives self hosters, home labs, and small teams files, photos, calendars, and contacts in a single lightweight deployment, aimed at anyone who wants the useful parts of a cloud suite without the operational weight of a traditional PHP stack.

read the full OxiCloud overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Files vs LocalSend Files vs rclone Files vs copyparty Files vs yazi Files vs Spacedrive Files vs Nextcloud Files vs uppy Files vs cloudreve Files vs superfile Files vs Seafile Files vs PairDrop Files vs dufs

Frequently asked questions

Is Files or OxiCloud more popular?

Files has 45,524 GitHub stars and OxiCloud has 3,576. Files has the larger community by that measure.

Are Files and OxiCloud free?

Both are open source. Files is licensed under MIT and OxiCloud under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Files and OxiCloud?

Files is written in C# and OxiCloud in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Files or OxiCloud?

Choose Files if you want the larger community (45,524 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose OxiCloud if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.