head to head · open source

Files vs explorerplusplus

Files has 45,731 GitHub stars, 2,946 forks, 458 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. explorerplusplus has 3,301 stars, 426 forks, 253 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Files leads on adoption by 1,285% (45,731 vs 3,301 stars). Files is written in C# under MIT; explorerplusplus is written in C++ under GPL-3.0. Files has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, explorerplusplus 13%. explorerplusplus was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-manager), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Files ★ 46K explorerplusplus ★ 3.3K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Files explorerplusplus
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 3.3K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in C# C++
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-28
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 426
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Files if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Files profile →

pick explorerplusplus if

  • You want the explorerplusplus feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches C++
  • You evaluated both and explorerplusplus fits your workflow better

full explorerplusplus profile →

About Files

Files is a modern, MIT licensed file manager for Windows, written in C and maintained by an open source community, for Windows users who want a customizable, actively developed alternative for organising files and folders.

read the full Files overview →

About explorerplusplus

Explorer++ is a lightweight, fast and completely portable open source file manager for Windows, written in C++ and licensed under GPL 3.0, aimed at Windows users who want tabbed browsing and more advanced file operations than the built in File Explorer provides.

read the full explorerplusplus overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 125K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs files localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Files vs LocalSend Files vs rclone Files vs copyparty Files vs yazi Files vs Spacedrive Files vs Nextcloud Files vs uppy Files vs cloudreve Files vs superfile Files vs ranger Files vs Seafile Files vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is Files or explorerplusplus more popular?

Files has 45,731 GitHub stars and explorerplusplus has 3,301. Files has the larger community by that measure.

Are Files and explorerplusplus free?

Both are open source. Files is licensed under MIT and explorerplusplus under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Files and explorerplusplus?

Files is written in C# and explorerplusplus in C++. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Files or explorerplusplus?

Choose Files if you want the larger community (45,731 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose explorerplusplus if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.