head to head · open source

Files vs elodie

Files has 45,620 GitHub stars, 2,933 forks, 458 open issues and last shipped yesterday. elodie has 1,504 stars, 160 forks, 122 open issues and last shipped 7 months ago. Files leads on adoption by 2,933% (45,620 vs 1,504 stars). Files is written in C# under MIT; elodie is written in Python under Apache-2.0. Files has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, elodie 11%. Files was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Files ★ 46K elodie ★ 1.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Files elodie
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 1.5K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in C# Python
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-02-15
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 160
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Files if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Files profile →

pick elodie if

  • You want the elodie feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and elodie fits your workflow better

full elodie profile →

About Files

Files is a modern, MIT licensed file manager for Windows, written in C and maintained by an open source community, for Windows users who want a customizable, actively developed alternative for organising files and folders.

read the full Files overview →

About elodie

Elodie is an open source, EXIF based photo, video and audio assistant and workflow automation tool, run from the command line in Python under the Apache 2.0 licence, for people who want a large personal media collection organized into a consistent folder structure without surrendering it to a proprietary photo database.

read the full elodie overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs files localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Files vs LocalSend Files vs rclone Files vs copyparty Files vs yazi Files vs Spacedrive Files vs Nextcloud Files vs uppy Files vs cloudreve Files vs superfile Files vs ranger Files vs Seafile Files vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is Files or elodie more popular?

Files has 45,620 GitHub stars and elodie has 1,504. Files has the larger community by that measure.

Are Files and elodie free?

Both are open source. Files is licensed under MIT and elodie under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Files and elodie?

Files is written in C# and elodie in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Files or elodie?

Choose Files if you want the larger community (45,620 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose elodie if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.