head to head · open source

Files vs dufs

Files has 45,518 GitHub stars, 2,918 forks, 458 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. dufs has 10,756 stars, 589 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped 3 months ago. Files leads on adoption by 323% (45,518 vs 10,756 stars). Files is written in C# under MIT; dufs is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. Files has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, dufs 5%. Files was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Files ★ 46K dufs ★ 11K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Files dufs
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 11K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in C# Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-06-29
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 589
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Files if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Files profile →

pick dufs if

  • You want the dufs feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and dufs fits your workflow better

full dufs profile →

About Files

Files is a modern, MIT licensed file manager for Windows, written in C and maintained by an open source community, for Windows users who want a customizable, actively developed alternative for organising files and folders.

read the full Files overview →

About dufs

Dufs is a Rust command line file server, released under the Apache 2.0 licence and distributed as dufs , that serves static files, accepts uploads, supports search and access control, and speaks WebDAV from a single binary.

read the full dufs overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Files vs LocalSend Files vs rclone Files vs copyparty Files vs yazi Files vs Spacedrive Files vs Nextcloud Files vs uppy Files vs cloudreve Files vs Seafile Files vs PairDrop Files vs OpenCloud Files vs cyberduck

Frequently asked questions

Is Files or dufs more popular?

Files has 45,518 GitHub stars and dufs has 10,756. Files has the larger community by that measure.

Are Files and dufs free?

Both are open source. Files is licensed under MIT and dufs under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Files and dufs?

Files is written in C# and dufs in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Files or dufs?

Choose Files if you want the larger community (45,518 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose dufs if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.