head to head · open source

Files vs doublecmd

Files has 45,660 GitHub stars, 2,938 forks, 458 open issues and last shipped yesterday. doublecmd has 4,564 stars, 356 forks, 634 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Files leads on adoption by 900% (45,660 vs 4,564 stars). Files is written in C# under MIT; doublecmd is written in Pascal under GPL-2.0. Files has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, doublecmd 8%. Files was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-manager), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Files ★ 46K doublecmd ★ 4.6K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

Files doublecmd
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 4.6K
License MIT GPL-2.0
Written in C# Pascal
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-24
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 356
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Files if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Files profile →

pick doublecmd if

  • You want the doublecmd feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Pascal
  • You evaluated both and doublecmd fits your workflow better

full doublecmd profile →

About Files

Files is a modern, MIT licensed file manager for Windows, written in C and maintained by an open source community, for Windows users who want a customizable, actively developed alternative for organising files and folders.

read the full Files overview →

About doublecmd

Double Commander is a free, cross platform, open source file manager that shows two panels side by side (or one above the other), and it is aimed at desktop users who want a twin pane file manager they can inspect and run without paying for a licence.

read the full doublecmd overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 206K Excalidraw ★ 133K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 93K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs files localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Files vs LocalSend Files vs rclone Files vs copyparty Files vs yazi Files vs Spacedrive Files vs Nextcloud Files vs uppy Files vs cloudreve Files vs superfile Files vs ranger Files vs Seafile Files vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is Files or doublecmd more popular?

Files has 45,660 GitHub stars and doublecmd has 4,564. Files has the larger community by that measure.

Are Files and doublecmd free?

Both are open source. Files is licensed under MIT and doublecmd under GPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Files and doublecmd?

Files is written in C# and doublecmd in Pascal. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Files or doublecmd?

Choose Files if you want the larger community (45,660 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose doublecmd if its feature set, stack or GPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.