head to head · open source

Files vs cyberduck

Files has 45,518 GitHub stars, 2,918 forks, 458 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. cyberduck has 4,786 stars, 369 forks, 506 open issues and last shipped yesterday. Files leads on adoption by 851% (45,518 vs 4,786 stars). Files is written in C# under MIT; cyberduck is written in Java under GPL-3.0. Files has attracted 6% as many forks as stars, cyberduck 8%. cyberduck was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Files ★ 46K cyberduck ★ 4.8K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

Files cyberduck
GitHub stars ★ 46K ★ 4.8K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in C# Java
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 2.9K ⑂ 369
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Files if

  • You weight community size — 46K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches C#
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Files profile →

pick cyberduck if

  • You want the cyberduck feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Java
  • You evaluated both and cyberduck fits your workflow better

full cyberduck profile →

About Files

Files is a modern, MIT licensed file manager for Windows, written in C and maintained by an open source community, for Windows users who want a customizable, actively developed alternative for organising files and folders.

read the full Files overview →

About cyberduck

Cyberduck is a libre FTP, SFTP, WebDAV, Amazon S3, Backblaze B2, Microsoft Azure & OneDrive and OpenStack Swift file transfer client for macOS and Windows, released under the GNU General Public License version 3 and developed at the iterate ch/cyberduck repository.

read the full cyberduck overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K Browser Use ★ 115K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K

Related comparisons

localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs seafile localsend vs pairdrop localsend vs opencloud localsend vs owncloud localsend vs sync-in localsend vs hoodik openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

Files vs LocalSend Files vs rclone Files vs copyparty Files vs yazi Files vs Spacedrive Files vs Nextcloud Files vs uppy Files vs cloudreve Files vs Seafile Files vs PairDrop Files vs dufs Files vs OpenCloud

Frequently asked questions

Is Files or cyberduck more popular?

Files has 45,518 GitHub stars and cyberduck has 4,786. Files has the larger community by that measure.

Are Files and cyberduck free?

Both are open source. Files is licensed under MIT and cyberduck under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Files and cyberduck?

Files is written in C# and cyberduck in Java. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Files or cyberduck?

Choose Files if you want the larger community (45,518 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose cyberduck if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.