head to head · open source

Fider vs pretty

Fider has 4,530 GitHub stars, 852 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pretty has 624 stars, 29 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 11 days ago. Fider leads on adoption by 626% (4,530 vs 624 stars). Fider is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; pretty is written in Clojure under Apache-2.0. Fider has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, pretty 5%. Fider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (feedback), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Fider ★ 4.5K pretty ★ 624 category Community & Social

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Fider pretty
GitHub stars ★ 4.5K ★ 624
License AGPL-3.0 Apache-2.0
Written in Go Clojure
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-07
Forks ⑂ 852 ⑂ 29
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Fider if

  • You weight community size — 4.5K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Fider profile →

pick pretty if

  • You want the pretty feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Clojure
  • You evaluated both and pretty fits your workflow better

full pretty profile →

About Fider

Fider is an open source, self hostable feedback portal, written in Go under the AGPL 3.0 licence, that lets a product team collect feature requests and suggestions from its customers and hear directly what they need.

read the full Fider overview →

About pretty

pretty is an Apache 2.0 Clojure library, published on Clojars as org.clj commons/pretty, that formats exception output, ANSI fonts and binary data so developers can read console and REPL output more easily.

read the full pretty overview →

More in Community & Social

Mastodon ★ 50K maigret ★ 38K glance ★ 37K Bluesky ★ 18K Lemmy ★ 15K giscus ★ 12K

Related comparisons

giscus vs fider giscus vs gamedevmind giscus vs alive-progress giscus vs guiadofrontend giscus vs guiadobackend giscus vs artalk giscus vs democracyos giscus vs human-review mastodon vs maigret mastodon vs glance maigret vs glance mastodon vs bluesky mastodon vs lemmy mastodon vs owncast mastodon vs misskey mastodon vs core

More Collaboration & Feedback projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Feedback field.

Fider vs giscus Fider vs GameDevMind Fider vs alive-progress Fider vs guiadofrontend Fider vs guiadobackend Fider vs Artalk Fider vs democracyos Fider vs human-review Fider vs LogChimp Fider vs helios-server Fider vs Autolab Fider vs mouthful

Frequently asked questions

Is Fider or pretty more popular?

Fider has 4,530 GitHub stars and pretty has 624. Fider has the larger community by that measure.

Are Fider and pretty free?

Both are open source. Fider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and pretty under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Fider and pretty?

Fider is written in Go and pretty in Clojure. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Fider or pretty?

Choose Fider if you want the larger community (4,530 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose pretty if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.