head to head · open source
Fider vs pretty
Fider has 4,597 GitHub stars, 875 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped yesterday. pretty has 625 stars, 29 forks, 3 open issues and last shipped 20 days ago. Fider leads on adoption by 636% (4,597 vs 625 stars). Fider is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; pretty is written in Clojure under Apache-2.0. Fider has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, pretty 5%. Fider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (feedback), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Fider | pretty | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 4.6K | ★ 625 |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Written in | Go | Clojure |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-10-14 |
| Forks | ⑂ 875 | ⑂ 29 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Fider if
- You weight community size — 4.6K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick pretty if
- You want the pretty feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Clojure
- You evaluated both and pretty fits your workflow better
About Fider
Fider.io • Fider Feedback • Fider Demo • Docs • Contributing Fider is a feedback portal for feature requests and suggestions. Give your customers a voice and let them tell you what they need. Spend less time guessing and more time building the right product. Getting Started ☁️ Fider Cloud The easiest and quickest way to get started. A fully managed services by the creators of Fider to help you get started in minutes. Forget about managing software updates and patches, we do it all for you! Sign up now 🏢 Self Hosted Install Fider on your own servers, in your own infrastructure. It's totally free, but of course…
read the full Fider overview →
About pretty
Sometimes, neatness counts If you are trying to puzzle out a stack trace, pick a critical line of text out of a long stream of console output, or compare two streams of binary data, a little bit of formatting can go a long way. That's what org.clj commons/pretty is for. It adds support for pretty output where it counts: Readable output for exceptions General ANSI font and background color support Readable output for binary sequences Or, compare an example from Pedestal's test suite: Or, same thing, but with Pretty enabled: The point is, you can scan down to see things in chronological order; the important parts…
read the full pretty overview →
More in Community & Social
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Feedback projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Feedback field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Fider or pretty more popular?
Fider has 4,597 GitHub stars and pretty has 625. Fider has the larger community by that measure.
Are Fider and pretty free?
Both are open source. Fider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and pretty under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Fider and pretty?
Fider is written in Go and pretty in Clojure. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Fider or pretty?
Choose Fider if you want the larger community (4,597 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose pretty if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.