head to head · open source

Fider vs human-review

Fider has 4,530 GitHub stars, 852 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped yesterday. human-review has 1,268 stars, 102 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. Fider leads on adoption by 257% (4,530 vs 1,268 stars). Fider is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; human-review is written in JavaScript under MIT. Fider has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, human-review 8%. Fider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (feedback), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

Fider ★ 4.5K human-review ★ 1.3K category Community & Social

← all 8884 open source comparisons

Side by side

Fider human-review
GitHub stars ★ 4.5K ★ 1.3K
License AGPL-3.0 MIT
Written in Go JavaScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-16
Forks ⑂ 852 ⑂ 102
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick Fider if

  • You weight community size — 4.5K stars and counting
  • You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full Fider profile →

pick human-review if

  • You want the human-review feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You evaluated both and human-review fits your workflow better

full human-review profile →

About Fider

Fider is an open source, self hostable feedback portal, written in Go under the AGPL 3.0 licence, that lets a product team collect feature requests and suggestions from its customers and hear directly what they need.

read the full Fider overview →

About human-review

Human Review is an open source JavaScript skill and local tool for visually reviewing and editing HTML and Markdown files inside AI coding agent workflows. It lets a person edit text, add comments, and send feedback to an AI agent in one batch. The project lives in the AI agent collaboration ecosystem.

read the full human-review overview →

More in Community & Social

Mastodon ★ 50K maigret ★ 38K glance ★ 37K Bluesky ★ 18K Lemmy ★ 15K giscus ★ 12K

Related comparisons

giscus vs fider giscus vs human-review giscus vs gamedevmind giscus vs alive-progress giscus vs guiadofrontend giscus vs guiadobackend giscus vs artalk giscus vs democracyos mastodon vs maigret mastodon vs glance maigret vs glance mastodon vs bluesky mastodon vs lemmy mastodon vs owncast mastodon vs misskey mastodon vs core

More Collaboration & Feedback projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Feedback field.

Fider vs giscus Fider vs GameDevMind Fider vs alive-progress Fider vs guiadofrontend Fider vs guiadobackend Fider vs Artalk Fider vs democracyos Fider vs LogChimp Fider vs helios-server Fider vs Autolab Fider vs mouthful Fider vs pretty

Frequently asked questions

Is Fider or human-review more popular?

Fider has 4,530 GitHub stars and human-review has 1,268. Fider has the larger community by that measure.

Are Fider and human-review free?

Both are open source. Fider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and human-review under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between Fider and human-review?

Fider is written in Go and human-review in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, Fider or human-review?

Choose Fider if you want the larger community (4,530 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose human-review if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.