head to head · open source
Fider vs human-review
Fider has 4,597 GitHub stars, 875 forks, 57 open issues and last shipped yesterday. human-review has 1,445 stars, 125 forks, 28 open issues and last shipped 2 months ago. Fider leads on adoption by 218% (4,597 vs 1,445 stars). Fider is written in Go under AGPL-3.0; human-review is written in JavaScript under MIT. Fider has attracted 19% as many forks as stars, human-review 9%. Fider was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (feedback), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.
Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.
← all 20902 open source comparisons
Side by side
| Fider | human-review | |
|---|---|---|
| GitHub stars | ★ 4.6K | ★ 1.4K |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Written in | Go | JavaScript |
| Last push | 2026-11-02 | 2026-09-17 |
| Forks | ⑂ 875 | ⑂ 125 |
| Self-hosting | Yes | Yes |
| Data ownership | Your server | Your server |
pick Fider if
- You weight community size — 4.6K stars and counting
- You want the AGPL-3.0 license terms
- Your stack matches Go
- You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance
pick human-review if
- You want the human-review feature set and don't need the biggest community
- You prefer the MIT license terms
- Your stack matches JavaScript
- You evaluated both and human-review fits your workflow better
About Fider
Fider.io • Fider Feedback • Fider Demo • Docs • Contributing Fider is a feedback portal for feature requests and suggestions. Give your customers a voice and let them tell you what they need. Spend less time guessing and more time building the right product. Getting Started ☁️ Fider Cloud The easiest and quickest way to get started. A fully managed services by the creators of Fider to help you get started in minutes. Forget about managing software updates and patches, we do it all for you! Sign up now 🏢 Self Hosted Install Fider on your own servers, in your own infrastructure. It's totally free, but of course…
read the full Fider overview →
About human-review
Human Review Edit HTML and Markdown files directly, leave comments like a Google Doc, and send all your feedback to your AI agent at once. Read the full launch post Problem Giving AI feedback on files in chat is painful. Sometimes you want to change one sentence yourself. Instead, you end up typing: In the third paragraph, change X to Y. Cut the third card because it repeats the first one. Also rewrite the CTA. Then the agent changes the file and you have to check whether it understood every instruction. This gets even harder when you’re reviewing a long plan, Markdown document, landing page, or multi page…
read the full human-review overview →
More in Community & Social
Related comparisons
More Collaboration & Feedback projects
Compare either of these against the rest of the Collaboration & Feedback field.
Frequently asked questions
Is Fider or human-review more popular?
Fider has 4,597 GitHub stars and human-review has 1,445. Fider has the larger community by that measure.
Are Fider and human-review free?
Both are open source. Fider is licensed under AGPL-3.0 and human-review under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.
What is the difference between Fider and human-review?
Fider is written in Go and human-review in JavaScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.
Which should I choose, Fider or human-review?
Choose Fider if you want the larger community (4,597 stars) or its AGPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose human-review if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.