head to head · open source

ffsend vs Hoodik

ffsend has 7,414 GitHub stars, 205 forks, 33 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. Hoodik has 1,479 stars, 68 forks, 11 open issues and last shipped 22 days ago. ffsend leads on adoption by 401% (7,414 vs 1,479 stars). ffsend is written in Rust under GPL-3.0; Hoodik is written in Rust under a custom or non-standard licence. ffsend has attracted 3% as many forks as stars, Hoodik 5%. Hoodik was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ffsend ★ 7.4K Hoodik ★ 1.5K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ffsend Hoodik
GitHub stars ★ 7.4K ★ 1.5K
License GPL-3.0 Custom / other
Written in Rust Rust
Last push 2025-11-20 2026-08-29
Forks ⑂ 205 ⑂ 68
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ffsend if

  • You weight community size — 7.4K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ffsend profile →

pick Hoodik if

  • You want the Hoodik feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Custom / other license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and Hoodik fits your workflow better

full Hoodik profile →

About ffsend

ffsend is a command line client for the Send file sharing service that uploads and downloads encrypted files and directories through a single terminal command, built for developers, system administrators and anyone who prefers a scriptable, privacy respecting alternative to a web upload form.

read the full ffsend overview →

About Hoodik

Hoodik is a self hosted, end to end encrypted cloud storage server. It lives in the Rust and Vue ecosystem, using Actix web on the backend and Vue 3 on the frontend, and it is packaged as a Docker first service with SQLite or PostgreSQL and S3 compatible storage options.

read the full Hoodik overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

ffsend vs LocalSend ffsend vs rclone ffsend vs copyparty ffsend vs Files ffsend vs yazi ffsend vs Spacedrive ffsend vs Nextcloud ffsend vs uppy ffsend vs cloudreve ffsend vs superfile ffsend vs ranger ffsend vs Seafile

Frequently asked questions

Is ffsend or Hoodik more popular?

ffsend has 7,414 GitHub stars and Hoodik has 1,479. ffsend has the larger community by that measure.

Are ffsend and Hoodik free?

Both are open source. ffsend is licensed under GPL-3.0, and Hoodik has no licence declared in this registry. Both are free to self-host.

What is the difference between ffsend and Hoodik?

ffsend is written in Rust and Hoodik in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ffsend or Hoodik?

Choose ffsend if you want the larger community (7,414 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose Hoodik if its feature set, stack or Custom / other licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.