head to head · open source

uppy vs ffsend

uppy has 30,989 GitHub stars, 2,103 forks, 186 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ffsend has 7,414 stars, 205 forks, 33 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. uppy leads on adoption by 318% (30,989 vs 7,414 stars). uppy is written in TypeScript under MIT; ffsend is written in Rust under GPL-3.0. uppy has attracted 7% as many forks as stars, ffsend 3%. uppy was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

uppy ★ 31K ffsend ★ 7.4K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

uppy ffsend
GitHub stars ★ 31K ★ 7.4K
License MIT GPL-3.0
Written in TypeScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-19 2025-11-20
Forks ⑂ 2.1K ⑂ 205
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick uppy if

  • You weight community size — 31K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full uppy profile →

pick ffsend if

  • You want the ffsend feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and ffsend fits your workflow better

full ffsend profile →

About uppy

Uppy is an MIT licensed, TypeScript built, modular JavaScript file uploader for web browsers that drops into any web application, aimed at developers who would rather wire up plugins than build file uploading from scratch.

read the full uppy overview →

About ffsend

ffsend is a command line client for the Send file sharing service that uploads and downloads encrypted files and directories through a single terminal command, built for developers, system administrators and anyone who prefers a scriptable, privacy respecting alternative to a web upload form.

read the full ffsend overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs uppy localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs cloudreve openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

uppy vs LocalSend uppy vs rclone uppy vs copyparty uppy vs Files uppy vs yazi uppy vs Spacedrive uppy vs Nextcloud uppy vs cloudreve uppy vs superfile uppy vs ranger uppy vs Seafile uppy vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is uppy or ffsend more popular?

uppy has 30,989 GitHub stars and ffsend has 7,414. uppy has the larger community by that measure.

Are uppy and ffsend free?

Both are open source. uppy is licensed under MIT and ffsend under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between uppy and ffsend?

uppy is written in TypeScript and ffsend in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, uppy or ffsend?

Choose uppy if you want the larger community (30,989 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ffsend if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.