head to head · open source

cloudreve vs ffsend

cloudreve has 28,737 GitHub stars, 3,896 forks, 147 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. ffsend has 7,414 stars, 205 forks, 33 open issues and last shipped 10 months ago. cloudreve leads on adoption by 288% (28,737 vs 7,414 stars). cloudreve is written in Go under GPL-3.0; ffsend is written in Rust under GPL-3.0. cloudreve has attracted 14% as many forks as stars, ffsend 3%. cloudreve was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (file-sharing), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

cloudreve ★ 29K ffsend ★ 7.4K category Productivity & Utilities

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

cloudreve ffsend
GitHub stars ★ 29K ★ 7.4K
License GPL-3.0 GPL-3.0
Written in Go Rust
Last push 2026-09-18 2025-11-20
Forks ⑂ 3.9K ⑂ 205
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick cloudreve if

  • You weight community size — 29K stars and counting
  • You want the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full cloudreve profile →

pick ffsend if

  • You want the ffsend feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the GPL-3.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and ffsend fits your workflow better

full ffsend profile →

About cloudreve

Cloudreve is a self hosted file management and sharing system written in Go that gives an organisation its own web file manager, sharing layer, and multi cloud storage gateway running on infrastructure it controls.

read the full cloudreve overview →

About ffsend

ffsend is a command line client for the Send file sharing service that uploads and downloads encrypted files and directories through a single terminal command, built for developers, system administrators and anyone who prefers a scriptable, privacy respecting alternative to a web upload form.

read the full ffsend overview →

More in Productivity & Utilities

n8n ★ 205K Excalidraw ★ 132K RustDesk ★ 124K LocalSend ★ 92K AppFlowy ★ 77K OBS Studio ★ 76K

Related comparisons

localsend vs cloudreve localsend vs rclone localsend vs copyparty localsend vs files localsend vs yazi localsend vs spacedrive localsend vs nextcloud localsend vs uppy openclaw vs khoj open-webui vs open-notebook open-webui vs khoj appflowy vs affine appflowy vs memos appflowy vs plane appflowy vs joplin mem0 vs memos n8n vs langchain n8n vs browser-use firecrawl vs browser-use n8n vs langgraph n8n vs frigate n8n vs lightpanda n8n vs proxmoxve n8n vs activepieces

More File Management & Sync projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the File Management & Sync field.

cloudreve vs LocalSend cloudreve vs rclone cloudreve vs copyparty cloudreve vs Files cloudreve vs yazi cloudreve vs Spacedrive cloudreve vs Nextcloud cloudreve vs uppy cloudreve vs superfile cloudreve vs ranger cloudreve vs Seafile cloudreve vs PairDrop

Frequently asked questions

Is cloudreve or ffsend more popular?

cloudreve has 28,737 GitHub stars and ffsend has 7,414. cloudreve has the larger community by that measure.

Are cloudreve and ffsend free?

Both are open source. cloudreve is licensed under GPL-3.0 and ffsend under GPL-3.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between cloudreve and ffsend?

cloudreve is written in Go and ffsend in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, cloudreve or ffsend?

Choose cloudreve if you want the larger community (28,737 stars) or its GPL-3.0 licence terms. Choose ffsend if its feature set, stack or GPL-3.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.