head to head · open source

ECC vs webdriverio

ECC has 262,175 GitHub stars, 39,228 forks, 228 open issues and last shipped today. webdriverio has 9,836 stars, 2,684 forks, 248 open issues and last shipped today. ECC leads on adoption by 2,565% (262,175 vs 9,836 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; webdriverio is written in TypeScript under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, webdriverio 27%. webdriverio was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 262K webdriverio ★ 9.8K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC webdriverio
GitHub stars ★ 262K ★ 9.8K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 39K ⑂ 2.7K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 262K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick webdriverio if

  • You want the webdriverio feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and webdriverio fits your workflow better

full webdriverio profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About webdriverio

WebdriverIO is an MIT licensed, TypeScript written test automation framework for Node.js that drives browsers and mobile applications through WebDriver, WebDriver BiDi, and Appium, aimed at engineering teams that write end to end, unit, and component tests in JavaScript or TypeScript.

read the full webdriverio overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs herdr ECC vs lapce

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or webdriverio more popular?

ECC has 262,175 GitHub stars and webdriverio has 9,836. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and webdriverio free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and webdriverio under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and webdriverio?

ECC is written in JavaScript and webdriverio in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or webdriverio?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (262,175 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose webdriverio if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.