head to head · open source

ECC vs taze

ECC has 262,175 GitHub stars, 39,228 forks, 228 open issues and last shipped today. taze has 4,283 stars, 150 forks, 33 open issues and last shipped 1 months ago. ECC leads on adoption by 6,021% (262,175 vs 4,283 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; taze is written in TypeScript under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, taze 4%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 262K taze ★ 4.3K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC taze
GitHub stars ★ 262K ★ 4.3K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-19 2026-08-14
Forks ⑂ 39K ⑂ 150
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 262K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick taze if

  • You want the taze feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and taze fits your workflow better

full taze profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About taze

taze is a modern CLI tool, written in TypeScript and released under the MIT licence, that keeps JavaScript and TypeScript project dependencies fresh by checking for newer versions, resolving what is safe to bump inside the ranges already declared in package.json , and optionally writing those changes back.

read the full taze overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs herdr ECC vs lapce

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or taze more popular?

ECC has 262,175 GitHub stars and taze has 4,283. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and taze free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and taze under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and taze?

ECC is written in JavaScript and taze in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or taze?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (262,175 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose taze if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.