head to head · open source

ECC vs msw

ECC has 261,896 GitHub stars, 39,186 forks, 228 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. msw has 18,210 stars, 626 forks, 37 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ECC leads on adoption by 1,338% (261,896 vs 18,210 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; msw is written in TypeScript under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, msw 3%. msw was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 262K msw ★ 18K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC msw
GitHub stars ★ 262K ★ 18K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 39K ⑂ 626
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 262K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick msw if

  • You want the msw feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and msw fits your workflow better

full msw profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About msw

Mock Service Worker (MSW) is an MIT licensed TypeScript library that intercepts network requests at the Service Worker level so JavaScript applications and tests can run against mocked APIs without any change to application code, and it is built for front end and full stack JavaScript developers who need consistent API mocking in the browser, in tests, and during local development.

read the full msw overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs herdr ECC vs lapce ECC vs TipTap

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or msw more popular?

ECC has 261,896 GitHub stars and msw has 18,210. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and msw free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and msw under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and msw?

ECC is written in JavaScript and msw in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or msw?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (261,896 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose msw if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.