head to head · open source

ECC vs ministack

ECC has 265,561 GitHub stars, 39,691 forks, 217 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ministack has 4,675 stars, 458 forks, 19 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ECC leads on adoption by 5,580% (265,561 vs 4,675 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; ministack is written in Python under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, ministack 10%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 266K ministack ★ 4.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC ministack
GitHub stars ★ 266K ★ 4.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Python
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 40K ⑂ 458
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 266K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick ministack if

  • You want the ministack feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Python
  • You evaluated both and ministack fits your workflow better

full ministack profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About ministack

MiniStack is a free, MIT licensed local AWS emulator written in Python that runs more than 60 AWS services on a single port, built for developers, testers and CI pipelines that need AWS compatible infrastructure without touching a real cloud account.

read the full ministack overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K pi ★ 109K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or ministack more popular?

ECC has 265,561 GitHub stars and ministack has 4,675. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and ministack free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and ministack under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and ministack?

ECC is written in JavaScript and ministack in Python. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or ministack?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (265,561 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose ministack if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.