head to head · open source

ECC vs mex

ECC has 265,561 GitHub stars, 39,691 forks, 217 open issues and last shipped yesterday. mex has 1,684 stars, 130 forks, 53 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ECC leads on adoption by 15,670% (265,561 vs 1,684 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; mex is written in TypeScript under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, mex 8%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 3 topic tags (claude-code, developer-tools, llm), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 266K mex ★ 1.7K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC mex
GitHub stars ★ 266K ★ 1.7K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript TypeScript
Last push 2026-09-22 2026-09-22
Forks ⑂ 40K ⑂ 130
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 266K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick mex if

  • You want the mex feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches TypeScript
  • You evaluated both and mex fits your workflow better

full mex profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About mex

MEX is an MIT licensed, TypeScript based tool that gives engineering teams and their coding agents a shared project memory kept as readable Markdown inside the repository and shared through ordinary Git commits, pushes, and pulls.

read the full mex overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K pi ★ 109K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or mex more popular?

ECC has 265,561 GitHub stars and mex has 1,684. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and mex free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and mex under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and mex?

ECC is written in JavaScript and mex in TypeScript. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or mex?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (265,561 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose mex if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.