head to head · open source

ECC vs lapce

ECC has 261,896 GitHub stars, 39,186 forks, 228 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. lapce has 38,860 stars, 1,331 forks, 901 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ECC leads on adoption by 574% (261,896 vs 38,860 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; lapce is written in Rust under Apache-2.0. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, lapce 3%. lapce was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 262K lapce ★ 39K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC lapce
GitHub stars ★ 262K ★ 39K
License MIT Apache-2.0
Written in JavaScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-18
Forks ⑂ 39K ⑂ 1.3K
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 262K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick lapce if

  • You want the lapce feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the Apache-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and lapce fits your workflow better

full lapce profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About lapce

Lapce is an Apache 2.0 licensed, native graphical code editor written in pure Rust for developers who want fast text editing, built in language intelligence, Vim style modal editing, and remote development support inside one application rather than assembled from a base editor plus a stack of extensions.

read the full lapce overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs herdr ECC vs TipTap ECC vs Directus

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or lapce more popular?

ECC has 261,896 GitHub stars and lapce has 38,860. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and lapce free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and lapce under Apache-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and lapce?

ECC is written in JavaScript and lapce in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or lapce?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (261,896 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose lapce if its feature set, stack or Apache-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.