head to head · open source

ECC vs gojq

ECC has 263,046 GitHub stars, 39,360 forks, 201 open issues and last shipped today. gojq has 3,804 stars, 154 forks, 18 open issues and last shipped yesterday. ECC leads on adoption by 6,815% (263,046 vs 3,804 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; gojq is written in Go under MIT. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, gojq 4%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 263K gojq ★ 3.8K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC gojq
GitHub stars ★ 263K ★ 3.8K
License MIT MIT
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-09-20 2026-09-19
Forks ⑂ 39K ⑂ 154
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 263K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick gojq if

  • You want the gojq feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and gojq fits your workflow better

full gojq profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About gojq

gojq is a pure Go implementation of the jq command line JSON processor, built for Go developers and shell users who want jq's query language without jq's C dependencies.

read the full gojq overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 209K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or gojq more popular?

ECC has 263,046 GitHub stars and gojq has 3,804. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and gojq free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and gojq under MIT. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and gojq?

ECC is written in JavaScript and gojq in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or gojq?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (263,046 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose gojq if its feature set, stack or MIT licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.