head to head · open source

ECC vs gitlogue

ECC has 261,896 GitHub stars, 39,186 forks, 228 open issues and last shipped 2 days ago. gitlogue has 4,983 stars, 114 forks, 12 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. ECC leads on adoption by 5,156% (261,896 vs 4,983 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; gitlogue is written in Rust under ISC. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, gitlogue 2%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 2 topic tags (developer-tools, productivity), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 262K gitlogue ★ 5.0K category Developer Tools

← all 15422 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC gitlogue
GitHub stars ★ 262K ★ 5.0K
License MIT ISC
Written in JavaScript Rust
Last push 2026-09-17 2026-09-14
Forks ⑂ 39K ⑂ 114
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 262K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick gitlogue if

  • You want the gitlogue feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the ISC license terms
  • Your stack matches Rust
  • You evaluated both and gitlogue fits your workflow better

full gitlogue profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About gitlogue

gitlogue is a cinematic Git commit replay tool for the terminal that turns a repository's commit history into an animated story with realistic typing, syntax highlighting and file tree transitions, aimed at developers who want to watch code change over time rather than read it as static log output.

read the full gitlogue overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 208K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 110K pi ★ 107K

Related comparisons

openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow react vs pocketbase langflow vs langchain react vs tooljet react vs appsmith openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed opencode vs neovim opencode vs zed vscode vs neovim vscode vs zed react vs kilocode

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs herdr ECC vs lapce ECC vs TipTap

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or gitlogue more popular?

ECC has 261,896 GitHub stars and gitlogue has 4,983. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and gitlogue free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and gitlogue under ISC. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and gitlogue?

ECC is written in JavaScript and gitlogue in Rust. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or gitlogue?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (261,896 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose gitlogue if its feature set, stack or ISC licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.