head to head · open source

ECC vs d2

ECC has 267,023 GitHub stars, 39,902 forks, 232 open issues and last shipped yesterday. d2 has 25,506 stars, 752 forks, 530 open issues and last shipped 5 days ago. ECC leads on adoption by 947% (267,023 vs 25,506 stars). ECC is written in JavaScript under MIT; d2 is written in Go under MPL-2.0. ECC has attracted 15% as many forks as stars, d2 3%. ECC was the more recently maintained of the two, and both are self-hostable with no licence fee. The two share 1 topic tag (developer-tools), so they are genuine substitutes rather than adjacent tools.

Two open source projects, one decision. Both are free and self-hostable — the differences are community size, license terms, language stack and release pace.

ECC ★ 267K d2 ★ 26K category Developer Tools

← all 20902 open source comparisons

Side by side

ECC d2
GitHub stars ★ 267K ★ 26K
License MIT MPL-2.0
Written in JavaScript Go
Last push 2026-09-24 2026-09-20
Forks ⑂ 40K ⑂ 752
Self-hosting Yes Yes
Data ownership Your server Your server

pick ECC if

  • You weight community size — 267K stars and counting
  • You want the MIT license terms
  • Your stack matches JavaScript
  • You value the larger contributor base for long-term maintenance

full ECC profile →

pick d2 if

  • You want the d2 feature set and don't need the biggest community
  • You prefer the MPL-2.0 license terms
  • Your stack matches Go
  • You evaluated both and d2 fits your workflow better

full d2 profile →

About ECC

ECC is an MIT licensed open source agent harness performance optimization system that gives AI coding agents a coordinated engineering workflow — plan, test, implement, review, verify, remember, improve — for developers working in Claude Code, Codex, OpenCode, Cursor, and other harnesses.

read the full ECC overview →

About d2

D2 is a modern diagram scripting language, written in Go and released under the MPL 2.0 licence, that turns plain text .d2 files into rendered diagrams such as SVGs, aimed at developers and teams who want their architecture and system diagrams kept as reviewable source rather than as opaque image files.

read the full d2 overview →

More in Developer Tools

react ★ 251K OpenCode ★ 210K vscode ★ 193K Langflow ★ 155K Supabase ★ 111K pi ★ 109K

Related comparisons

ecc vs react ecc vs langflow ecc vs supabase ecc vs puppeteer ecc vs nango ecc vs jitsu ecc vs aci-dev ecc vs convertigo ecc vs orbital openclaw vs langflow react vs langflow react vs supabase n8n vs langflow openclaw vs openhands openclaw vs paperclip hermes-agent vs pi hermes-agent vs openhands hermes-agent vs paperclip opencode vs pi opencode vs openhands opencode vs paperclip react vs vscode react vs neovim react vs zed

More Frameworks & Platforms projects

Compare either of these against the rest of the Frameworks & Platforms field.

ECC vs react ECC vs Langflow ECC vs Supabase ECC vs puppeteer ECC vs archify ECC vs PocketBase ECC vs i-have-adhd ECC vs codebase-memory-mcp ECC vs ToolJet ECC vs AppSmith ECC vs it-tools ECC vs herdr

Frequently asked questions

Is ECC or d2 more popular?

ECC has 267,023 GitHub stars and d2 has 25,506. ECC has the larger community by that measure.

Are ECC and d2 free?

Both are open source. ECC is licensed under MIT and d2 under MPL-2.0. Neither carries a licence fee.

What is the difference between ECC and d2?

ECC is written in JavaScript and d2 in Go. The practical differences are community size, licence terms, language stack and release cadence — all compared in the table above.

Which should I choose, ECC or d2?

Choose ECC if you want the larger community (267,023 stars) or its MIT licence terms. Choose d2 if its feature set, stack or MPL-2.0 licence fits better. Both are self-hostable.